Measures of Adherence to Oral Hypoglycemic Agents at the Primary Care Clinic Level
The Role of Risk Adjustment
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9102517 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Edwin S Wong (0000-0002-6079-686X, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, autor de correspondencia), John D Piette (0000-0002-7241-2798, Michigan Medicine), Chuan-Fen Liu, Chuan‐Fen Liu (0000-0002-6915-8194, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, autor de correspondencia), Mark Perkins (VA Puget Sound Health Care System, autor de correspondencia), Matthew L Maciejewski (0000-0003-1765-5938, Durham VA Medical Center), George L Jackson (Durham VA Medical Center), David K Blough, Stephan D Fihn (VA Puget Sound Health Care System, autor de correspondencia), David H Au (0000-0001-8207-4975, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, autor de correspondencia), Chris L Bryson (VA Puget Sound Health Care System, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2012 |
| Volumen | 50 |
| Número | 7 |
| Páginas | 591-598 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2012-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editorial | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0b013e318249cb74 |
| PMID | 22354208 |
| OpenAlex | W2080203033 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 35 |
BACKGROUND: Prior research found that in the Veterans Affairs health care system (VA), the proportion of patients adherent to oral hypoglycemic agents varies from 50% to 80% across primary care clinics. This study examined whether variation in patient and facility characteristics determined those differences. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 444,418 VA primary care patients with diabetes treated in 559 clinics in fiscal year (FY) 2006-2007. Patients' adherence to each oral hypoglycemic agent was computed for the first 3 months of FY2007, and averaged across agents to produce an adherence score for the patient's overall regimen. Patients with an adherence score over 0.8 were defined as adherent. Risk adjustment used hierarchical logistic regression accounting for patient factors and facility effects by clustering patients within clinics and clinics within parent VA medical centers. We then assessed the influence of risk adjustment using observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios computed for each clinic. RESULTS: The mean unadjusted proportion of adherent patients in clinics was 0.715 (interdecile range 0.559-0.826). The percent variation in patient's likelihood of being adherent explained at the patient, clinic, and parent VA medical center levels was 2.94%, 0.27%, and 0.76%, respectively. The mean clinic-level observed-to-expected ratio was 1.001 (interdecile range 0.975-1.027). CONCLUSIONS: The variation in the proportion of patients adherent across clinics remained large after risk adjustment. As patient and facility effects explained only 4% of the variance in adherence, comparing clinics based on unadjusted scores is a reasonable starting point unless more predictive patient, provider, and facility factors are identified
Cohort · Diabetes mellitus · Family medicine · Logistic regression · Primary care · Regimen · Retrospective cohort study · Veterans Affairs · Diabetes Management and Education · Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine · Medication Adherence and Compliance · Medicine
Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records
Social Support and Patient Adherence to Medical Treatment
Department of Veterans Affairs' Quality Enhancement Research Initiative for Diabetes Mellitus
An Empirical Basis for Standardizing Adherence Measures Derived From Administrative Claims Data Among Diabetic Patients
VA Community-Based Outpatient Clinics
A Refill Adherence Algorithm for Multiple Short Intervals to Estimate Refill Compliance (ReComp)
Applying Diagnostic Cost Groups to Examine the Disease Burden of VA Facilities
Meaningful Variation in Performance
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2016 - 2019 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |