Comparative Responsiveness of Generic Versus Disease-Specific and Weighted Versus Unweighted Health Status Measures in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9102833 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Louis Bessette (0000-0002-6834-2731, Université Laval, autor correspondente), Oliver Sangha, Karen M Kuntz (0000-0001-6335-7590), Robert B Keller, R Lew (0000-0003-3448-021X), Robert A Lew, Anne H Fossel, Jeffrey N Katz (0000-0003-2104-4670) |
| Ano | 1998 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 491-502 |
| Data de publicação | 1998-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editora | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/00005650-199804000-00005 |
| PMID | 9544589 |
| OpenAlex | W1971552767 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 14 |
| Referências citadas | 22 |
OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the relative responsiveness to change of generic versus disease-specific and unweighted versus weighted health status measures in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: Data were obtained from 196 subjects followed in a prospective community-based cohort study in Maine who underwent carpal tunnel release (The Maine Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Study). Patients were evaluated before and 6 months after surgery. The disease-specific, unweighted severity score was derived from the validated Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Assessment Questionnaire. Patients were asked to rate the importance of each symptom included in the severity score. Each severity question was weighted by its importance, creating a disease-specific weighted score. Generic instruments were the SF-36, SF-12, and a Quality of Life Rating Scale. Sensitivity to change was calculated with the standardized response mean (SRM, mean change/standard deviation of change) as well as the effect size (ES, mean change/standard deviation of baseline values). The ability of the instruments to distinguish clinically important differences was assessed by correlating the changes in scores with global ratings on satisfaction and perceived improvement as external criteria. RESULTS: The disease-specific weighted score (SRM: 1.56, ES: 1.99) was more responsive than the unweighted score (SRM: 1.36, ES: 1.57). The Quality of Life Rating Scale, SF-36, and SF-12 subscales were less sensitive to change, with standardized response means and effect sizes that ranged from -0.23 to 0.88. The ability to distinguish clinically important differences was higher for the two disease-specific scales. The coefficients of correlation with the external criteria ranged from 0.50 to 0.56 for the unweighted score and 0.56 to 0.62 for the weighted score and were significantly stronger than the correlations between external measures and the most responsive subscale of the SF-36 (Bodily Pain subscale, r = 0.36). The SF-12 health survey performed as well as the SF-36 in term of responsiveness and ability to distinguish clinically important change. CONCLUSIONS: Disease-specific measures were superior to generic measures in capturing clinical change after carpal tunnel release, and a weighted score was slightly more responsive than the unweighted score. The SF-12 showed comparable psychometric properties compared with the longer 36-item Short-Form Survey
Carpal tunnel · Carpal tunnel syndrome · Cohort · Physical therapy · Prospective cohort study · Quality of life (healthcare) · Rating scale · Severity of illness · Standard deviation · Statistics · Foot and Ankle Surgery · Internal Medicine · Mathematics · Medicine · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation · Peripheral Nerve Disorders · Surgery
Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design
Is a Generic Quality of Life Instrument Helpful for Evaluating Women with Urinary Incontinence
Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life
Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life
On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments
How sharp is the short QuickDash? A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions
Measurement properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire in subjects with neurophysiological confirmation of carpal tunnel syndrome
Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke
Reliability and validity of functional health status and health-related quality of life questionnaires in children with recurrent acute otitis media
Effects of financial empowerment and self-confidence in financial empowerment on financial well-being
Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life
Use of SF-36 and SF-12 Health Status Measures
Methodological Inquiries in Health Status Assessment
Psychometric Properties of the SF-12 (Hebrew Version) in a Primary Care Population in Israel
Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluation
Measuring change over time
Bootstrap Methods
Measurement of health status
Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life
A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Physician use in Ontario and the United States
Workers' compensation recipients with carpal tunnel syndrome
Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic Evaluation
Generic and Disease-Specific Measures in Assessing Health Status and Quality of Life
Comparative Measurement Sensitivity of Short and Longer Health Status Instruments
Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status
| Obras citantes distintas | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1998 - 2023 (26) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 13 |