Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Thurstone Scaling as a Measurement Method to Quantify Subjective Health Outcomes

Bibliographic Data

ID9103064
AuthorsPaul F M Krabbe (0000-0001-6042-1243, Medicines Evaluation Unit, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume46
Issue4
Pages357-365
Publication date2008-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e31815ceca9
PMID18362814
OpenAlexW2094960773
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited37

BACKGROUND: Many objective health outcome measures are used to monitor patients or evaluate health interventions, but there are also subjective measures. For the latter, it is difficult to derive metric data, which are needed to quantify health outcomes such as functional disability, severity of side effects, and health status. OBJECTIVE: Thurstone's Law of Comparative Judgment is presented as an alternative means to derive metric values for subjective health outcomes. The appeal of Thurstone's scaling model is that it can transform subjective individual rank order data or comparative preference data to a single group composite interval scale. To demonstrate its contribution, an empirical study was conducted, focusing on the valuation of health states. RESEARCH DESIGN: Rank order data were collected for 18 health states and were then used as input for Thurstone scaling. Visual analogue scale (VAS) values were also collected for the same states. SUBJECTS: An agency for market research recruited 212 Dutch respondents aged 18-75 years. RESULTS: The derived Thurstone values showed a strong relationship with the VAS values. The positions of the 2 worst states were almost identical on the VAS and the Thurstone scale. Intermediate states were scaled somewhat differently by the 2 methods. CONCLUSIONS: For many subjective health outcomes, Thurstone scaling and its derivatives may be an attractive methodology to arrive at quantitative measures

Developmental psychology · Econometrics · Economics · Geography · Metric (unit) · Multidimensional scaling · Preference · Scale (ratio) · Statistics · Thurstone scale · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Health disparities and outcomes · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • A Program of Methodological Research to Arrive at the New International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol

    Open Access•Mark Oppe, Nancy Devlin et al.•Value in Health•2014

  • Social, psychological, and environmental-structural factors determine consistent condom use among rural-to-urban migrant female sex workers in Shanghai China

    Open Access•Xiuxia Ye, Meili Shang et al.•BMC Public Health•2012

  • Benefit Seekers or Principle Holders? Experimental Evidence on Americans’ Democratic Trade-Offs

    Open Access•Chloe Mortenson, Erik C Nisbet•Perspectives on Politics•2025

  • Racial Disparities in Treatment Preferences for Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Florina Constantinescu, Suzanne Goucher et al.•Medical Care•2009

  • Modeling Subjective Health Outcomes

    Alberto Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto Maydeu‐olivare et al.•Medical Care•2008

  • Choice Defines Qalys

    Brandon M Craig, Benjamin M Craig et al.•Medical Care•2018

  • Multinational Evidence of the Applicability and Robustness of Discrete Choice Modeling for Deriving EQ-5D-5L Health-State Values

    Open Access•Paul F M Krabbe, Nancy Devlin et al.•Medical Care•2014

  • Techniques of attitude scale construction.

    Allen L Edwards•1957

  • Applying the Rasch Model

    Trevor G Bond, Christine Fox et al.•Applying the Rasch Model•2001

  • Unidimensional Scaling

    John Mciver, E G Carmines et al.•Unidimensional Scaling•1981

  • On the Theory of Scales of Measurement

    Open Access•S S Stevens•Science•1946

  • Conjoint Analysis in Marketing

    Open Access•Paul E Green, V Srinivasan•Journal of Marketing•1990

  • EuroQol

    Open Access•Richard Brooks•Health Policy•1996

  • Economic Choices

    Daniel Mcfadden•American Economic Review•2001

  • A law of comparative judgment.

    L L Thurstone•Psychological Review•1927

  • An Item Analysis Which Takes Individual Differences Into Account

    Open Access•Gernot Rasch•British Journal of Mathematical…•1966

  • Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs

    Ralph Allan Bradley, Milton E Terry•Biometrika•1952

  • Simultaneous conjoint measurement

    Open Access•R Duncan Luce, John W Tukey•Journal of Mathematical Psychology•1964

  • Normal Scaling of the Unidimensional Dominance Matrices

    Open Access•David J Krus, Patricia H Krus•Educational and Psychological…•1977

  • Applying the Rasch Model

    Open Access•Trevor G Bond, Christine Fox et al.•Journal of Educational Measurement•2003

  • Elementary Signal Detection Theory

    Thomas D Wickens•Elementary signal detection theory•2001

  • Testing the interval-level measurement property of multi-item visual analogue scales

    Open Access•Paul F M Krabbe, Peep F M Stalmeier et al.•Quality of Life Research•2006

  • The Transformation of Utilities for Health States Worse Than Death

    Leida M Lamers•Medical Care•2007

  • Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States

    Paul Dolan•Medical Care•1997

  • Methods for quality adjustment of life years

    Open Access•Erik Nord•Social Science & Medicine•1992

  • The comparability and reliability of five health-state valuation methods

    Open Access•Paul F M Krabbe, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1997

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,39
Citation span2008 - 2025 (18)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae