Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Pediatric Economic Database Evaluation (Pede) Project

Establishing a Database to Study Trends in Pediatric Economic Evaluation

Bibliographic Data

ID9103253
AuthorsWendy J Ungar (0000-0002-0762-0101, University of Toronto, corresponding author), Maria Teresa Santos (0000-0001-8976-6691, corresponding author)
Year2003
Volume41
Issue10
Pages1142-1152
Publication date2003-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/01.mlr.0000088451.56688.65
PMID14515110
OpenAlexW1997708448
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited13

BACKGROUND: While standard methods for conducting economic evaluations have evolved, little attention has been paid to the conduct of these studies in special populations such as children. OBJECTIVES: To build a database of pediatric economic evaluations and to examine trends in publication characteristics over a 20-year period. RESEARCH DESIGN: The database was created through a multisource search strategy, manual review, application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, data extraction, and reliability assessment. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize trends in publication volume, disease category, intervention type, and age group between 1980 and 1999. RESULTS: From an initial cut of 5600 citations identified from 12 journal databases, 787 were included as full pediatric economic evaluations. Volume of publications increased 7-fold between 1980 to 1984 and 1995 to 1999 from 61 to 440 citations per 5-year period. Most studies were performed in children aged 1 to 12 years, and studies in infants displayed an increasing frequency. The most common disease category was infective/parasitic, comprising 24% of studies. Studies of congenital anomalies and complications of pregnancy were also prominent. Although health prevention studies were the most prevalent, health treatment studies demonstrated an equal frequency in 1995 to 1999. Most studies consisted of malaria control and vaccination strategies for hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type B, measles, and varicella. CONCLUSIONS: The number of pediatric economic evaluations is steadily increasing with most publications representing health prevention interventions. The Pediatric Economic Database Evaluation (PEDE) Project database will be valuable to health researchers working in methods research and conducting systematic reviews

Alternative medicine · Data extraction · Database · Descriptive statistics · Economic evaluation · Environmental health · Family medicine · Inclusion and exclusion criteria · MEDLINE · Pathology · Psychological intervention · Statistics · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Computer Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Medicine · Nursing · Pediatrics

  • Characteristics and quality of pediatric cost-utility analyses

    Open Access•Seija Kromm, Seija K Kromm et al.•Quality of Life Research•2011

  • Views, obstacles, and uncertainties around the inclusion of children and young people's time in economic evaluations

    Open Access•Lazaros Andronis, Cameron Morgan et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2023

  • High agreement but low Kappa

    Open Access•Alvan R Feinstein, Domenic V Cicchetti•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•1990

  • The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

    J R Landis, Gary G Koch•Biometrics•1977

  • Are We Ready to Use Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Health Care Decision-Making

    Elaine J Power, John M Eisenberg•Medical Care•1998

  • Health Care CBA/CEA

    Anne Elixhauser, Bryan R Luce et al.•Medical Care•1993

  • Health Care CBA and CEA from 1991 to 1996

    Anne Elixhauser, Michael T Halpern et al.•Medical Care•1998

  • Cost-Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Health Care

    Kenneth E Warner, Rebecca C Hutton•Medical Care•1980

  • On-Line Access to a Cost-Benefit/Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Bibliography Via CDC Wonder

    Andrew Friede, William R Taylor et al.•Medical Care•1993

  • Evaluation of health technology

    Open Access•Michael Drummond•Social Science & Medicine•1994

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,13
Citation span2011 - 2023 (13)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae