Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Can Economic Model Transparency Improve Provider Interpretation of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis? A Response

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9103629
AutoresJoshua T Cohen (0000-0003-1737-0991, Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, autor correspondente), John B Wong (0000-0003-4203-9010, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA)
Ano2017
Volume55
Fascículo11
Páginas912-914
Data de publicação2017-11-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000000811
PMID29028754
OpenAlexW2763766138
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas3
Referências citadas8

To enhance the credibility and the value of health economic analyses, we argue that the computer model source code underlying these analyses should be made publicly available. Only with open publication is it possible for others to assess whether alternative assumptions, beyond those examined by the model authors, alter the model’s findings. Because reproducibility is critical for scientific acceptance and because computation increasingly permeates scientific inquiry, other fields have moved toward open publication of computer models, and health economics should avoid falling behind. Making source code available shines a light on these otherwise black boxes and facilitates their complete evaluation and understandability. The preceding commentary makes 2 arguments against open publication. It claims first that open publication would undermine intellectual property rights and discourage work in this field. We respond that the impact on intellectual property would be minimal, and that open publication could even increase model value. The second argument against open publication is the possibility of model misuse. If anything, however, open publication would reduce this risk by making the model implementation completely transparent. We argue finally that open publication of models would have ancillary benefits by making the research more amenable for adaptation and innovation. Moving toward open publication will present challenges, but we believe that the benefits of increased scientific credibility and utility, particularly for health policy and clinical practice decisions, will certainly outweigh the harms

Argument (complex analysis) · Computer security · Credibility · Economics · Intellectual property · Interpretation (philosophy) · Law and economics · Open data · Open Science · Political science · Positive economics · Public relations · Transparency (behavior) · Value (mathematics) · Computer Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Law · Medicine · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • Point-Counterpoint

    Alan Cohen, Alan B Cohen•Medical Care•2017

  • Finding Resolution for the Responsible Transparency of Economic Models in Health and Medicine

    William V Padula, R Brett McQueen et al.•Medical Care•2017

  • Social, ethical, and other value judgments in health economics modelling

    Open Access•Seven Harvard, Stephanie Harvard et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2020

  • Antifragile

    Open Access•John P A Ioannidis, Nassim Nicholas Taleb et al.•Antifragile•2012

Obras citantes distintas3
Citações por ano0,33
Intervalo de citações2017 - 2020 (4)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae