Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Differences in Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group Survey Scores by Recency of the Last Visit

Implications for Comparability of Periodic and Continuous Sampling

Bibliographic Data

ID9103693
AuthorsClaude Messan Setodji (0000-0001-9592-422X, RAND Corporation, corresponding author), Q Burkhart (0000-0003-2081-3482, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA), Ron D Hays (0000-0001-6697-907X, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research), Denise D Quigley (0000-0002-3815-908X, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA), Samuel A Skootsky (0000-0002-9995-436X, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA), Marc N Elliott (0000-0002-7147-5535, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA)
Year2019
Volume57
Issue12
Pagese80-e86
Publication date2019-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001134
PMID31107400
OpenAlexW2946597052
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited20

BACKGROUND: Patient experience data can be collected by sampling patients periodically (eg, patients with any visits over a 1-year period) or sampling visits continuously (eg, sampling any visit in a monthly interval). Continuous sampling likely yields a sample with more frequent and more recent visits, possibly affecting the comparability of data collected under the 2 approaches. OBJECTIVE: To explore differences in Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group survey (CG-CAHPS) scores using periodic and continuous sampling. RESEARCH DESIGN: We use observational data to estimate case-mix-adjusted differences in patient experience scores under 12-month periodic sampling and simulated continuous sampling. SUBJECTS: A total of 29,254 adult patients responding to the CG-CAHPS survey regarding visits in the past 12 months to any of 480 physicians, 2007-2009. MEASURES: Overall doctor rating and 4 CG-CAHPS composite measures of patient experience: doctor communication, access to care, care coordination, and office staff. RESULTS: Compared with 12-month periodic sampling, simulated continuous sampling yielded patients with more recent visits (by definition), more frequent visits (92% of patients with 2+ visits, compared with 76%), and more positive case-mix-adjusted CAHPS scores (2-3 percentage points higher). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with more frequent visits reported markedly higher CG-CAHPS scores, but this causes only small to moderate changes in adjusted physician-level scores between 12-month periodic and continuous sampling schemes. Caution should be exercised in trending or comparing scores collected through different schemes

Case mix index · Comparability · Confidence interval · Family medicine · Health care · Observational study · Patient experience · Patient satisfaction · Psychiatry · Sampling (signal processing) · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Surgery

  • A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys

    Open Access•Rebecca Anhang Price, Denise D Quigley et al.•Medical Care•2022

  • The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 2

    Open Access•Elliott S Fisher, David E Wennberg et al.•Annals of Internal Medicine•2003

  • Examining the Role of Patient Experience Surveys in Measuring Health Care Quality

    Open Access•Rebecca Anhang Price, Marc N Elliott et al.•Medical Care Research and Review•2014

  • Evaluating the use of a modified CAHPS® survey to support improvements in patient‐centred care

    Open Access•Elizabeth Davies, Dale Shaller et al.•Health Expectations•2008

  • Survey mode matters

    Open Access•Lorraine S Wallace, Deena J Chisolm et al.•Journal of Health Psychology•2013

  • A power primer

    Jacob Cohen•Psychological Bulletin•1992

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae