Caveats for the Use of Operational Electronic Health Record Data in Comparative Effectiveness Research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9104645 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William R Hersh, William Hersh (0000-0002-4114-5148, Oregon Health & Science University, corresponding author), Mark G Weiner (0000-0001-5586-9940, AstraZeneca (Brazil)), Peter J Embi (0000-0002-7733-0847, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center), Judith R Logan, Judith Logan (0000-0002-8112-7999, Oregon Health & Science University, corresponding author), Philip Payne (0000-0002-9532-2998, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center), Philip R O Payne, Elmer V Bernstam (0000-0001-7643-791X, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston), Harold P Lehmann (0000-0002-7698-219X, Johns Hopkins University), George Hripcsak (0000-0003-2664-7614, Columbia University), Timothy H Hartzog (Medical University of South Carolina), James J Cimino (0000-0003-4101-1622, Oregon Health & Science University, corresponding author), Joel H Saltz, Joel Saltz (0000-0002-3451-2165, AstraZeneca (United States)) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | Supplement 8Suppl 3 |
| Pages | S30-S37 |
| Publication date | 2013-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31829b1dbd |
| PMID | 23774517 |
| PMCID | PMC3748381 |
| OpenAlex | W2137767404 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 23 |
The growing amount of data in operational electronic health record systems provides unprecedented opportunity for its reuse for many tasks, including comparative effectiveness research. However, there are many caveats to the use of such data. Electronic health record data from clinical settings may be inaccurate, incomplete, transformed in ways that undermine their meaning, unrecoverable for research, of unknown provenance, of insufficient granularity, and incompatible with research protocols. However, the quantity and real-world nature of these data provide impetus for their use, and we develop a list of caveats to inform would-be users of such data as well as provide an informatics roadmap that aims to insure this opportunity to augment comparative effectiveness research can be best leveraged
Alternative medicine · Comparative effectiveness research · Data science · Electronic health record · Health care · Health records · Informatics · Management science · Public health · Reuse · Risk analysis (engineering) · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Computer Science · Data Quality and Management · Electronic Health Records Systems · Health Informatics · Medicine
What Should Oversight of Clinical Decision Support Systems Look Like
Machine Learning in Medicine
Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence
Changes in Tobacco Use Patterns among Veterans in San Diego during the Recent Peak of the Covid-19 Pandemic
Consore
Social Work Research Using Electronic Health Records and Criminal Justice Data
Utilizing Big Data analytics and electronic health record data in HIV prevention, treatment, and care research
Variation in Laboratory Test Naming Conventions in EHRs Within and Between Hospitals
Predicting Self-Reported Social Risk in Medically Complex Adults Using Electronic Health Data
The “Meaningful Use” Regulation for Electronic Health Records
How the Continuity of Care Document Can Advance Medical Research and Public Health
Challenges in Using Electronic Health Record Data for CER
Validity of Using an Electronic Medical Record for Assessing Quality of Care in an Outpatient Setting
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,13 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2024 (7) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |