Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Can History and Physical Examination Be Used as Markers of Quality

An Analysis of the Initial Visit Note in Musculoskeletal Care

Bibliographic Data

ID9104822
AuthorsDaniel H Solomon (0000-0001-8202-5428, Brigham and Women's Hospital), Jonathan L Schaffer (0000-0002-3131-3355, Brigham and Women's Hospital), Jeffrey N Katz (0000-0003-2104-4670, Brigham and Women's Hospital), Jan Horský (0000-0002-3714-5698), Elisabeth Burdick (Brigham and Women's Hospital), Eric Nadler (0000-0003-3727-9247, Brigham and Women's Hospital), David W Bates (0000-0001-5440-6039, Brigham and Women's Hospital)
Year2000
Volume38
Issue4
Pages383-391
Publication date2000-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-200004000-00005
PMID10752970
OpenAlexW2053762633
LanguageEN
References cited9

BACKGROUND: The medical record serves as an important source of information regarding the care process, but few studies have examined whether thoroughness of documentation is associated with outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to analyze the initial visit note for 513 patients presenting with acute musculoskeletal pain, compare thoroughness of documentation by physician specialty, and determine whether thoroughness of documentation was associated with clinical improvement or patient satisfaction. METHODS: A structured medical record abstraction was performed to examine whether treating physicians documented key historical and physical exam findings. Satisfaction with care, symptom relief, and functional improvement were assessed after 3 months with validated survey instruments. RESULTS: In the initial visit note, 43+/-16% of selected historical findings and 28+/-17% of physical examination findings were documented. Orthopedic surgeons documented 2 to 4 more historical and physical examination items (P <0.01) and assigned more specific diagnoses (P <0.01) than rheumatologists and general internists. Multivariate models showed a very weak association between all aspects of documentation and patient satisfaction with the provider-patient interaction (all partial R2 <0.016) and no association between documentation and 3-month pain relief or functional status. Patients' perception of physician communication was more highly associated with patient satisfaction (P = 0.0001) than was documentation. CONCLUSIONS: No provider types consistently documented many important historical items and physical examination findings. While thoroughness of documentation was not associated with clinical outcomes, there was a very weak relationship between documentation and patient satisfaction with provider-patient interactions

Documentation · Family medicine · Medical history · Medical record · MEDLINE · Multivariate analysis · Patient satisfaction · Physical examination · Physical therapy · Specialty · Electronic Health Records Systems · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Nursing · Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Surgery

  • Incidence of Adverse Events and Negligence in Hospitalized Patients

    Troyen A Brennan, LUCIAN L LEAPE et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•1991

  • A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies

    Open Access•Mary E Charlson, Peter Pompei et al.•Journal of Chronic Diseases•1987

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae