Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rectifying the Course of Rectification

Bibliographic Data

ID9194387
AuthorsPaul S Davies (0000-0001-9039-3562, Fellow Gonville and Caius College Cambridge, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume75
Issue3
Pages412-426
Publication date2012-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0026-7961 • E-ISSN: 1468-2230
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00908.x
OpenAlexW2159990459
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited6

In Daventry District Council v Daventry & District Housing Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1153, the majority of the Court of Appeal held that a contract should be rectified because of a common mistake. This note discusses that decision and recent developments in the law of rectification. It is argued that the approach of the majority in Daventry is unsatisfactory, and that an emphasis upon ascertaining whether the parties have objectively made a common mistake may be inappropriate: rectification should only be granted in order to reflect the parties’ subjective intentions. Such an approach might help to distinguish common mistake rectification from unilateral mistake rectification

Appeal · Business · Economics · Electrical engineering · Law and economics · Mistake · Order (exchange) · Political science · Rectification · Engineering · European and International Contract Law · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal principles and applications

  • Where There's a Will There's a Way

    Open Access•James Goodwin, Edward Granger et al.•Modern Law Review•2015

Citations per year0.09
Citation span2015 - 2015 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae