Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The ‘Chimera’ of Parenthood

Bibliographic Data

ID9196559
AuthorsBrian Sloan (0000-0003-3468-8950, Campo Arqueologico de Mertola, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume84
Issue3
Pages503-531
Publication date2021-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0026-7961 • E-ISSN: 1468-2230
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1468-2230.12602
OpenAlexW3113346243
LanguageEN

In apparently the first reported instance of a paternity test being ‘fooled’ by a ‘human chimera’, a man ‘failed’ a paternity test because the genetic material in his saliva was shown to be different from that in his sperm. Such a chimera has extra genes, here absorbed from a twin lost in early pregnancy. The result was that the 'true' genetic father of the man's son was the twin, who had never been born. Chimeras present a challenge to legal systems, given the frequent emphasis on genetics in determining parenthood. This paper considers the phenomenon's potential implications for English law's understanding of parenthood. It advocates the recognition of the chimeric person as the ‘true’ legal father and suggests two methods through which this might be accomplished, pointing out their broader consequences. The paper also explores English law's likely practical response to the situation of a potential chimera

Biology · Chimera (genetics) · Developmental psychology · Gene · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Genetics · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae