Religionswissenschaft or Religiology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9205656 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Reinhard Pummer (0000-0003-1791-5111, 1Ottawa, Canada, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1972 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2/3 |
| Pages | 91 |
| Publication date | 1972-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Numen (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0029-5973 • E-ISSN: 1568-5276 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3269740 |
| OpenAlex | W4245316592 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 19 |
The following essay presents a few reflections on the history of religions as a discipline in the light of certain critical questions that have been raised lately by some authors. Such questions areWhat is history of religions? How is it related to theology Has it outlived its usefulness? Has the time come to replace it with a unified discourse that is at the same time scientific, theological, philosophical, and pastoral? Since the latter attempts are sometimes called religiology, the title of the present paper is or Religiology ? In the year 1887, P. D. Chantepie de la Saussaye began his Lehrbuch der Religionsgeschichte by stating that is a new discipline which developed independently only in the last few decades, and is still partly in the process of becoming and has to fight for recognition of its rights (21, p. 2). Similar statements have been made throughout the eighty-four years that have passed since then. Method, status, and academic study of Religionswissenschaft are still subjects of discussions by representatives of that discipline as well as by scholars in other fields, among them especially theologians (lo4; 107). On an international scale though, the picture seems to be varied and even contradictory. Thus, in 1968, W. G. Oxtoby, then of the Yale University, testified to the prospering of the field in American universities and colleges (69, p. 590). In 1971, C. Welch states that the recognition of the legitimacy of the academic study of religion is a well established fact (122, p. 6). From these and other voices it could be inferred that, despite all methodological discussions currently carried on, Religionswissenschaft is a firmly rooted and recognized academic discipline that is not any more in the stage of becoming than any other discipline. After all, every branch of learning is in a constant process of development, and especially now wissenschaftstheoretische
Discipline · Epistemology · Field (mathematics) · History of religions · Legitimacy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Globalization, Historical Perspectives, and International Relations · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religious studies · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices · Study and Philosophy of Religion
O teólogo e o cientista da religião. Religiografia acerca das interfaces entre Ciências da Religião ou Religiologia e Teologia no Brasil
Ecstasy – a way to religious knowledge
The Fall and Rise of Methodology
R.C. Zaehner and the sacred book
Religion as the academic's enemy
The Pioneering Appearances of Philosophy of Religion in Europe
Dilemmas with Disciplinary Hierarchies and Ideals of Scientific Research in the Study of Religion
On references to the transcendent in the scientific study of religion
The concept of the transcendent
For a secular return to the sacred
Geography of religions
The history of religions
The scientific study of religion
History of Religions
Die Religionspsychologie im Gefüge der Wissenschaft
Die empirische Religionspsychologie als Zweig der Religionswissenschaft
The Phenomenology of Religion
(Gedanken Zu Einer Religionsgeschichtlichen Anthropologie 1)
Summary of the Discussion
(Religionswissenschaft in Polen *)
Marburg - and After
Resurgences D'Un Probleme De Methode En Histoire Des Religions 1
History of Religions
(Comparing the Religio-Historical and the Theological Method1)
Religion as an Academic Discipline
Interpretative Categories and the History of Religions
Adde Parvum Parvo Magnus Acervus Erit
Religion, a Humanistic Field
Religion
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,24 |
| Citation span | 1976 - 2023 (48) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |