Fair Trade,” Market Failures, and (the Absence of) Institutions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9256381 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew Samuel (0000-0002-8059-3365, Loyola University Maryland), Fred W Derrick (Loyola University Maryland), Charles E Scott (Loyola University Maryland), Charles Scott (0000-0002-5963-5663) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 209-232 |
| Publication date | 2014-04-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of Social Economy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6764 • E-ISSN: 1470-1162 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00346764.2014.882705 |
| OpenAlex | W1965070753 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 8 |
This paper presents an analysis of Fair Trade using a general equilibrium model of an economy where externalities are present and where the institutional or legal framework needed to regulate these externalities may be weak. Weak institutions and externalities are common in the developing world, where Fair Trade is targeted, making perfect competition models inappropriate measures of the value of Fair Trade. Members of Fair Trade cooperatives are required to adopt sustainable production methods, and not employ other socially harmful practices such as child-labor. Thus, Fair Trade organizations can serve as a complement to the existing weak institutions in the economy, creating incentives for entrepreneurs to move from the informal to the formal sector. Specifically, the analysis confirms that in many cases an increase in the Fair Trade premium can reduce the overall level of harmful activities, even from those producers who are not Fair Trade certified, and thereby raise welfare
Business · Economics · Externality · Fair trade · Free trade · General equilibrium theory · Incentive · International economics · International trade · Market economy · Microeconomics · Production (economics) · Trade barrier · Welfare · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Taxation and Compliance Studies
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,3 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2021 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |