Digital behavioral technology, vulnerability and justice
Towards an integrated approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9256982 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lisa M Herzog (0000-0001-9348-1154, University of Groningen, corresponding author), Philipp Kellmeyer (0000-0001-5538-373X, Neuroethics and AI Ethics Lab, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany), Verina Wild (0000-0003-3012-7662, Ethik der Medizin, Universität Augsburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Augsburg) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 7-28 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of Social Economy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6764 • E-ISSN: 1470-1162 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00346764.2021.1943755 |
| OpenAlex | W3176763847 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 49 |
The paper introduces the notion of ‘digital behavioral technologies’ and discusses them from the perspectives of vulnerability and justice, thereby integrating perspectives from bioethics or public health ethics and political philosophy. Digital behavioral technologies have seen a massive uptake in recent years, but the market for them is hardly regulated. We argue that understanding the impact of digital behavioral technologies requires understanding individuals not as abstract, atomized agents, but rather to take their embeddedness into social structures into account. This also allows extending the focus to groups, relationships and whole societies, which are often structurally unjust. This perspective provides a corrective to an overly individualistic consideration of digital behavioral technologies, which may suggest itself because of their focus on individual bodies. We point out some implications of this integrated approach with regard to the regulation of digital behavioral technologies. We conclude by describing some implications both for those who work on digital behavioral technologies and for those who work on questions of vulnerability and justice
Computer security · Economic Justice · Embeddedness · Emerging technologies · Engineering ethics · Individualism · Perspective (graphical) · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Vulnerability (computing) · Work (physics) · Computer Science · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Engineering · Innovative Human-Technology Interaction · Law · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Psychology · Social Psychology
Datificación en Contextos Educativos. Entre Subjetivación y Ética
Ethics of sleep tracking
A cautionary tale
Interdisciplinary perspectives on digital technologies for global mental health
Informed consent and algorithmic discrimination – is giving away your data the new vulnerable
Introduction to the special issue ‘digital behavioral technologies, vulnerability, and justice’
Tales of self-empowerment through digital health technologies
Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics
The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy
Social Determinants of Health
Vulnerability in Research and Health Care; Describing the Elephant in the Room?
The Limitations of “Vulnerability” as a Protection for Human Research Participants
What is digital literacy? A comparative review of publications across three language contexts
Socioeconomic determinants of health
Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion
Metric Society
Structural Injustice
Refugees and others enduring displacement
Digitised health, medicine and risk
Maximizing Opportunities and Minimizing Risks for Children Online
Elucidating the concept of vulnerability
How are pregnant women vulnerable research participants
Learning in Real-World Laboratories
Quantified sex
Income inequality and health
The quantified self
Children and young people’s rights in the digital age
Mapping the Margins
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,75 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |