Generalising About Ovid

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9290502
AutoresStephen Hinds (University of Michigan, autor de correspondencia)
Año1987
Volumen16
Número1-2
Páginas4-31
Fecha de publicación1987-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaRamus (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0048-671X • E-ISSN: 2202-932X
EditorialCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/s0048671x00003234
OpenAlexW2800399446
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas54
Referencias citadas13

The aim of this essay is to confront some ageing generalisations about Ovid which seem to have survived the latest close readings of his poetry intact. Most of the critics who have recently been casting new light on particular poems and passages have been too cautious to use their very specific findings to call explicitly into question long-established overviews of the Ovidian oeuvre . However, an attempt of some kind should be made. Today's generalisation is nothing more than an accretion of yesterday's particular readings; and reassessment of it can come only when it is tested against a new generation of particular readings. My focus, therefore, will be on specifics, but with an untimid eye towards overviews. A like absence of timidity will also be found in my specifics themselves. Writers of ‘general’ articles tend to eschew difficult or controversial interpretations of particular passages, lest some overall balance in their presentation of an author be upset. I shall have few such qualms: one of my aims is precisely to destabilise — however slightiy — the terms of reference within which Ovidian poetry is usually read. Indeed, I shall risk beginning with what will probably be the most controversial reading in my essay

Aesthetics · Art · Epistemology · Focus (optics · Linguistics · Literature · Nothing · Poetry · Presentation (obstetrics · Reading (process · Yesterday · Classical Antiquity Studies · History · Philosophy · Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism