Native America, Discovered and Conquered
Thomas Jefferson, Lewis & Clark, and Manifest Destiny
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9308466 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert J Miller (0000-0002-8350-3759, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Publication date | 2006-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Native America, Discovered and Conquered (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Praeger (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5040/9798400689635 |
| OpenAlex | W4399238202 |
| Open Library | OL10289711M |
| ISBN | 9798400689635 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 21 |
Manifest Destiny, as a term for westward expansion, was not used until the 1840s. Its predecessor was the Doctrine of Discovery, a legal tradition by which Europeans and Americans laid legal claim to the land of the indigenous people that they discovered. In the United States, the British colonists who had recently become Americans were competing with the English, French, and Spanish for control of lands west of the Mississippi. Who would be the discoverers of the Indians and their lands, the United States or the European countries? We know the answer, of course, but in this book, Miller explains for the first time exactly how the United States achieved victory, not only on the ground, but also in the developing legal thought of the day. The American effort began with Thomas Jefferson's authorization of the Lewis & Clark Expedition, which set out in 1803 to lay claim to the West. Lewis and Clark had several charges, among them the discovery of a Northwest Passage—a land route across the continent—in order to establish an American fur trade with China. In addition, the Corps of Northwestern Discovery, as the expedition was called, cataloged new plant and animal life, and performed detailed ethnographic research on the Indians they encountered. This fascinating book lays out how that ethnographic research became the legal basis for Indian removal practices implemented decades later, explaining how the Doctrine of Discovery became part of American law, as it still is today
Archaeology · Doctrine · Ethnography · Ethnology · Geography · Indigenous · Manifest destiny · Miller · Political science · Politics · Victory · Archaeology and Natural History · Ecology · History · Law · (1804-1806) · 1743-1826 · America · American history · discovery and exploration · Ethnic Studies - Native American Studies · Geographical discovery & exploration · Government relations · History - General History · Indians · Indians of North America · Indigenous peoples · Jefferson, Thomas · Lewis and Clark Expedition · Lewis and clark expedition (1804-1806) · Lewis and Clark Expedition (1804-1806) (uri) http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n84018492 (uri) http://viaf.org/viaf/sourceID/LC|n84018492 · Lewis and Clark Expedition (1804-1806) http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n84018492 · Native American · Native American Studies · North america · North American · race relations · Relations with Indians · Social Science · Sociology · Territorial expansion · Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) · united states
Sacralizing Dominion
Christianity, settler colonialism, and resource extraction
Wrestling with God
Nature and Antiquities
The Palestinian human right to full Israeli citizenship
Dual pandemics awaken urgent call to advance anti-racism education in social work
This is our land”
Colonial Charters
Legality and Legitimacy in American Military Interventions
Theorizing necropolitics in social studies education
Hannah Arendt, education, and the question of totalitarianism
Religiosity and Spiritual Engagement in Two American Indian Populations
Liberal Pacification and the Phenomenology of Violence
Beyond the Equator (Principles)
Understanding racial equity in research with Indigenous Peoples
Modernity, landscape conquest, and the mobility politics of stilt-walking in Landes region, France
The Maya Enlightenment
Saving the Commons in an Age of Plunder
Development and Wealth
Going My Way? Wending a Way Through the Stumbling Blocks Between Georgism and Catholicism
Prioritizing Indigenous Peoples' knowledge in federal decision-making
| Unique citing works | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,24 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2026 (18) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 20 |