Home Rule for India
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9436748 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Graham H Stuart (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1919 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 301-305 |
| Publication date | 1919-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1946208 |
| OpenAlex | W2322257863 |
| Language | EN |
The epoch-marking proclamation issued by Queen Victoria in 1858 announced to the people of India that they were to be admitted freely and impartially to political office. The autocratic bureaucracy of foreigners, culminating in the régime of Lord Curzon, when only about 4 per cent of the members of the Indian civil service were natives, was hardly a fulfillment of the spirit of this proclamation. Nor did the peoples of India consider it such. The spirit of unrest finally took shape in the Indian National Congress, founded in 1885, to give expression to the ideas of the educated classes; and this body soon came to be regarded as the unofficial Indian parliament. Each year it brought forward a list of ills which the government of India as then organized could not hope to remedy
Autocracy · Bureaucracy · Civil service · Democracy · Economics · Government (linguistics · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Proclamation · Public service · Rupee · Unrest · Law · Philosophy · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |