Sculpture and Perspective

Bibliographic Data

ID9467786
AuthorsRobert Hopkins (0000-0003-0443-5207, University of Sheffield, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume50
Issue4
Pages357-373
Publication date2010-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal of Aesthetics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0904 • E-ISSN: 1468-2842
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/aesthj/ayq032
OpenAlexW2016484314
LanguageEN
Citations received3

In every picture there is a perspective: the picture represents its object from a point (or points) of view. Is the same true of sculpture, and in particular is it true of the purest form of sculpture, sculpture in the round? I address this issue in two ways. First, I explore the prospects for reasoning that perspective forms part of the content of some sculptures by adapting an argument from M. G. F. Martin for the parallel claim in the case of visualizing. I conclude that the argument does not transfer successfully to the sculptural case. Second, I turn to the question whether sculptural experience presents the sculpted object from a point of view. That is, does our experience of sculpture involve, not merely a perspective on the sculpture itself, but a distinct perspective on the object visible in that sculpture? I consider, and reject, an argument for thinking that the answer is 'yes' before turning to two arguments for distinguishing sculpture from pictorial representations in this respect. That leaves us with no reason to think sculpture does involve perspective, rather than having reason to think it does not. I end by considering a principle that would allow us to close this gap

Aesthetics · Argument (complex analysis · Art · Geometry · Linguistics · Object (grammar · Perspective (graphical · Point (geometry · Sculpture · Visual arts · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art · Mathematics · Philosophy · Visual Culture and Art Theory

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub