Thomas Piketty. Capital in the Twenty-First Century
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9488887 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mary O’sullivan (0000-0002-7429-836X, University of Geneva, corresponding author), Mary O'Sullivan |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 120 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 564-566 |
| Publication date | 2015-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The American Historical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-8762 • E-ISSN: 1937-5239 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ahr/120.2.564 |
| OpenAlex | W2331243182 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
It is difficult to think of a recent book by a social scientist, and impossible to think of one by an economist, that is of as much potential interest to historians as Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Its central question is an inherently historical one about the relationship between capital accumulation and inequality in the very long run. And the theory that Piketty proposes by way of an answer—that rising inequality is inherent to the dynamics of capitalism—depends for its persuasiveness on the historical analysis he draws on to substantiate it. The book also deserves historians' attention for Piketty's admonishment of economists for “their absurd claim to greater scientific legitimacy, despite the fact that they know almost nothing about anything” (p. 32), and his enthusiasm for the study of history as an antidote. Indeed, in Piketty's mind, his book is “as much a work of history as of economics” (p. 33).
Capital (architecture) · Capitalism · Economics · Enthusiasm · Epistemology · Inequality · Legitimacy · Neoclassical economics · Nothing · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Economic Theory and Policy · History · Law · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |