Les Jeux Sont Faits
Comparative Law—As It Really Was Meant to Be
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9529963 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peer Zumbansen (0000-0002-9373-8607, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue | suppl_1 |
| Pages | 237-255 |
| Publication date | 2017-07-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The American Journal of Comparative Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-919X • E-ISSN: 2326-9197 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ajcl/avx021 |
| OpenAlex | W2735058438 |
| Language | EN |
This invited commentary offers a number of reflections in response to a recent article by Pierre Legrand. In that article, several frontlines are drawn between what Legrand considers the right and the wrong ways of doing comparative law. The following commentary tries to make sense of both the origin and direction of what oftentimes comes across as an overly harsh and even polemical critique of different scholars who are active in the field.
Epistemology · Field (mathematics) · Political science · Sociology · Comparative and International Law Studies · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction · European and International Contract Law · Law · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|