Imagery and Recognition
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9619341 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter E Morris (University of Exeter), R L Reid (University of Exeter) |
| Year | 1974 |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 7-12 |
| Publication date | 1974-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1974.tb02765.x |
| OpenAlex | W2148074123 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Subjects who were instructed to form images, and control subjects, were allowed an average of 3 sec./word in Expt. I and 6 sec./word in Expt. II to study a mixed list of 50 high I and 50 low I nouns. Recognition was tested upon a list containing the old words mixed with an equal number of new high I and low I nouns. Analysis of total errors showed that high I nouns were recognized better than low I nouns and that instructions to form images improved the recognition of high I nouns. Instructions to form images improved the recognition of old high I nouns, but did not reduce the number of false positives. However, high I value was associated with fewer false positives, but not with better recognition of old words. It is suggested that better recognition following instructions to image is the result of images actually elicited but that better recognition of high I than of low I nouns results from a greater semantic similarity among low I than among high I words
Cognitive psychology · False positive paradox · Image (mathematics) · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Noun · Pattern recognition (psychology) · Proper noun · Reading (process) · Similarity (geometry) · Speech recognition · Word (group theory) · Word recognition · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Psychology · Text Readability and Simplification · Topic Modeling
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,05 |
| Citation span | 1987 - 1994 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |