Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Plinko

Eliciting beliefs to build better models of statistical learning and mental model updating

Bibliographic Data

ID9619499
AuthorsPeter A V DiBerardino (0000-0001-7607-9278, Department of Psychology University of Waterloo Waterloo Ontario Canada), Alexandre L S Filipowicz (0000-0002-1311-386X, Toyota Research Institute Los Altos California USA), James Danckert (0000-0001-8093-066X, Department of Psychology University of Waterloo Waterloo Ontario Canada), Britt Anderson (0000-0001-5310-1495, Department of Psychology University of Waterloo Waterloo Ontario Canada, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume115
Issue4
Pages759-786
Publication date2024-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/bjop.12724
PMID39096484
OpenAlexW4401284752
LanguageEN
References cited81

Prior beliefs are central to Bayesian accounts of cognition, but many of these accounts do not directly measure priors. More specifically, initial states of belief heavily influence how new information is assumed to be utilized when updating a particular model. Despite this, prior and posterior beliefs are either inferred from sequential participant actions or elicited through impoverished means. We had participants to play a version of the game ‘Plinko’, to first elicit individual participant priors in a theoretically agnostic manner. Subsequent learning and updating of participant beliefs was then directly measured. We show that participants hold various priors that cluster around prototypical probability distributions that in turn influence learning. In follow‐up studies, we show that participant priors are stable over time and that the ability to update beliefs is influenced by a simple environmental manipulation (i.e., a short break). These data reveal the importance of directly measuring participant beliefs rather than assuming or inferring them as has been widely done in the literature to date. The Plinko game provides a flexible and fecund means for examining statistical learning and mental model updating

Bayesian inference · Bayesian probability · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Data mining · Machine learning · Measure (data warehouse) · Prior probability · Artificial Intelligence · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Child and Animal Learning Development · Computer Science · Psychology · Statistical Mechanics and Entropy

  • Ggplot2

    Open Access•Hadley Wickham•Ggplot2•2016

  • Spatial Data Science

    Edzer Pebesma, Roger Bivand•Spatial Data Science•2023

  • The Automaticity of Visual Statistical Learning.

    Nicholas B Turk-Browne, Justin A Jungé et al.•Journal of Experimental…•2005

  • Fuzzy-trace theory

    Open Access•Valerie F Reyna, Charles J Brainerd•Learning and Individual Differences•1995

  • Attentional requirements of learning

    Open Access•Mary Jo Nissen, Peter Bullemer•Cognitive Psychology•1987

  • The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data Analysis

    Open Access•Hadley Wickham•Journal of Statistical Software•2011

  • How to Grow a Mind

    Open Access•Joshua B Tenenbaum, Candace Kemp et al.•Science•2011

  • Measuring Expectations

    Open Access•Charles F Manski•Econometrica•2004

  • Optimal Predictions in Everyday Cognition

    Open Access•Thomas L Griffiths, Joshua B Tenenbaum•Psychological Science•2006

  • Implicit learning and statistical learning

    Open Access•Pierre Perruchet, Sébastien Pacton•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2006

  • Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Bayesian models of cognition

    Open Access•Matt Jones, Bradley C Love•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2011

  • On Information and Sufficiency

    Open Access•S Kullback, R A Leibler•The Annals of Mathematical…•1951

  • Seeing Sets

    Open Access•Dan Ariely•Psychological Science•2001

  • Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants

    Open Access•Jenny Saffran, Jenny R Saffran et al.•Science•1996

  • Biased confabulation in risky choice

    Open Access•Alice Mason, Christopher R Madan et al.•Cognition•2022

  • Statistical learning research

    Ram Frost, Blair C Armstrong et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2019

  • Valuation and estimation from experience

    Open Access•Sebastian Olschewski, Ben R Newell et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2021

  • Mental Models

    Marilyn Ford, Philip N Johnson-Laird•Language•1985

  • A bias–variance trade-off governs individual differences in on-line learning in an unpredictable environment

    Open Access•Christopher M Glaze, Alexandre L S Filipowicz et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2018

  • Judgments under uncertainty

    Open Access•John E Fisk•British Journal of Psychology•2002

  • Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience

    Jean S Bowers, Jeffrey S Bowers et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2012

  • Man as an intuitive statistician

    Cameron R Peterson, Lee Roy Beach•Psychological Bulletin•1967

  • Choosing Outcomes versus Choosing Products

    Daniel G Goldstein, E Johnson et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2008

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae