Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The influence of trait and physical‐feature‐based orienting strategies on aspects of facial memory

Bibliographic Data

ID9619913
AuthorsAlan J Parkin (University of Nottingham, corresponding author), Cheryl Hayward, Cheryl M Hayward (0000-0003-4640-1443, University of Nottingham, corresponding author)
Year1983
Volume74
Issue1
Pages71-82
Publication date1983-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.2044-8295.1983.tb01844.x
PMID6831143
OpenAlexW1986122782
LanguageEN
Citations received4

This paper describes a series of incidental learning experiments in which facial memory is assessed following either a ‘connotative feature’ task (how likable is this person?) or a ‘distinctive feature task’ (what is the most prominent physical feature of this face?). Subjects saw each target face in a different environmental setting (e.g. pub, carpark) and their memory was tested in two ways: an old/new recognition test, in which each target face was presented in mugshot form (i.e. devoid of the original context), and a second context recall or recognition test in which subjects' ability to remember the environmental context in which each face had appeared was examined. The results showed five important findings: (1) subjects performed the connotative task significantly faster than the distinctive features task; (2) recognition accuracy measured in various ways was identical in the two orienting conditions; (3) recognition latencies to targets and distractors in the yes/no recognition test were significantly faster following connotative processing; (4) recognition latencies to target faces presented in context during learning were significantly faster than targets initially presented devoid of context following connotative processing but not following distinctive features orientation; and (5) context recall and recognition were significantly and substantially higher following connotative processing. These data are discussed in terms of Winograd's (1981) assertion that connotative and physical‐feature‐based orienting tasks induce the same type of encoding

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Context (archaeology) · Face (sociological concept) · Facial recognition system · Feature (linguistics) · Linguistics · Pattern recognition (psychology) · Recall · Recognition memory · Task (project management) · Communication · Face Recognition and Perception · Neuroscience · Psychology

  • Choosing, confidence, and accuracy

    Siegfried L Sporer, Steven Penrod et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1995

  • The Applicability of Facial Memory Research

    Gwilym M Davies, Graham M Davies•Handbook of research on face…•1989

  • Reflections on the Semantics of Faces

    James C Bartlett•Handbook of research on face…•1989

  • Name and Face Learning in Older Adults

    Angela K Troyer, A Hafliger et al.•The Journals of Gerontology…•2006

Citations per year0.11
Citation span1989 - 2006 (18)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae