The influence of trait and physical‐feature‐based orienting strategies on aspects of facial memory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9619913 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alan J Parkin (University of Nottingham, corresponding author), Cheryl Hayward, Cheryl M Hayward (0000-0003-4640-1443, University of Nottingham, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1983 |
| Volume | 74 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 71-82 |
| Publication date | 1983-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1983.tb01844.x |
| PMID | 6831143 |
| OpenAlex | W1986122782 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
This paper describes a series of incidental learning experiments in which facial memory is assessed following either a ‘connotative feature’ task (how likable is this person?) or a ‘distinctive feature task’ (what is the most prominent physical feature of this face?). Subjects saw each target face in a different environmental setting (e.g. pub, carpark) and their memory was tested in two ways: an old/new recognition test, in which each target face was presented in mugshot form (i.e. devoid of the original context), and a second context recall or recognition test in which subjects' ability to remember the environmental context in which each face had appeared was examined. The results showed five important findings: (1) subjects performed the connotative task significantly faster than the distinctive features task; (2) recognition accuracy measured in various ways was identical in the two orienting conditions; (3) recognition latencies to targets and distractors in the yes/no recognition test were significantly faster following connotative processing; (4) recognition latencies to target faces presented in context during learning were significantly faster than targets initially presented devoid of context following connotative processing but not following distinctive features orientation; and (5) context recall and recognition were significantly and substantially higher following connotative processing. These data are discussed in terms of Winograd's (1981) assertion that connotative and physical‐feature‐based orienting tasks induce the same type of encoding
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Context (archaeology) · Face (sociological concept) · Facial recognition system · Feature (linguistics) · Linguistics · Pattern recognition (psychology) · Recall · Recognition memory · Task (project management) · Communication · Face Recognition and Perception · Neuroscience · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.11 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1989 - 2006 (18) |
| Highly cited | No |