Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Effects of Practice and Rest on Fluctuations in the Müller–lyer Illusion

Bibliographic Data

ID9620404
AuthorsH J Eysenck (University of London), P Slater (University of London)
Year1958
Volume49
Issue3
Pages246-256
Publication date1958-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.2044-8295.1958.tb00662.x
PMID13572796
OpenAlexW2093436104
LanguageEN
Citations received3

Fifty subjects are given sixty trials each with an apparatus exhibiting the Müller–Lyer illusion. The first forty trials (divided for analysis into four periods of ten) are uninterrupted; a 30 sec. pause for fixation is followed by a fifth period of ten trials; and a rest pause of 30 min. by a final period. On the group as a whole, practice produces scarcely any effect. The means differ very little from trial to trial from period to period, and the amount of variation about them tends to remain constant. The effect of the illusion varies greatly on different individuals. The variance between the subjects' means for the experiment as a whole constitutes 63% of the total. There are also striking differences in the effects of practice on different subjects; these person:period interactions account for another 14%. The error variance forms almost the whole of the remainder (22%). To classify the person:period interactions, a principal component analysis was employed. The first latent root, accounting for 59% of the variance due to interaction, describes a course of change which retains the same direction for any particular subject (whether upwards or downwards, towards or away from the point of zero illusion) up to the end of the fifth period but is reversed by the rest pause. The authors do not consider the terminology of satiation or improvement with practice suitable for describing the whole range of such phenomena, but suggest a description in terms of habit reinforcement. However, the phenomena exhibited by subsequent components, which cannot be neglected as statistically non‐significant, do not seem so explicable. All such performances constitute patterns of search, and it is noteworthy that none of them accord with the oscillatory pattern suggested by cybernetic theory. Scores on scales of neuroticism and extraversion‐introversion failed to correlate significantly with individual differences either in the effect of the illusion over the experiment as a whole or in the progressive changes induced by practice

Audiology · Cognitive psychology · Illusion · Period (music) · Reinforcement · Rest (music) · Statistics · Variance (accounting) · Mathematics · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • The suitability of topology for the investigation of geometric-perceptual phenomena

    Open Access•Farshad Nemati•Phenomenology and the Cognitive…•2025

  • Cognitive controls of attention deployment as determinants of visual illusions

    R W Gardner•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1961

  • A general scheme for the analytic decomposition of objective test scores

    Open Access•Lewis R Goldberg•Journal of Research in Personality•1979

Citations per year0.05
Citation span1961 - 2025 (65)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae