Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Attentional bias and decision order in a reasoning task

Bibliographic Data

ID9620654
AuthorsJ St B T Evans (Plymouth Marine Laboratory, corresponding author), Linden J Ball (0000-0002-5099-0124, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, corresponding author), Philip G Brooks (Plymouth Marine Laboratory, corresponding author)
Year1987
Volume78
Issue3
Pages385-394
Publication date1987-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.2044-8295.1987.tb02256.x
OpenAlexW1968090253
LanguageEN
Citations received1

An experiment is reported which is designed to test the hypothesis that selection errors in the abstract form of the Wason four‐card selection task derive from an attentional bias. Specifically, it is hypothesized that subjects' choices are based upon the perceived relevance of the exposed sides of the cards, as determined by linguistic cues, and that they do not reflect any analysis of the possible hidden sides of the card as required by the logical task. The methodology used derives from an earlier, unpublished experiment in which the task was presented by a microcomputer which recorded the order in which decisions were made about each of the four cards. It was predicted that subjects would consider first those cards deemed to be ‘relevant’. The earlier study had found predicted associations between decision order and decision frequency based upon the well‐established ‘matching bias’ effect. This finding was replicated and extended to another linguistic bias in the experiment reported here which improved upon the design of the previous experiment in several respects. In the earlier study, a strong left‐to‐right influence of spatial layout of the cards on decision order was also observed. In the present experiment a rectangular layout reduced but did not eliminate the effects of spatial location. Subjects' decisions to accept or reject cards were also biased by their spatial location, in a surprising manner. The results are discussed with reference to contemporary theories of reasoning

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Matching (statistics) · Order (exchange) · Relevance (law) · Selection (genetic algorithm) · Statistics · Task (project management) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Robust intuition? Exploring the difference in the strength of intuitions from perspective of attentional bias

    Open Access•Yunhong Wang, Wei Bao et al.•Thinking & Reasoning•2024

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae