Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

When retrieval cueing fails

Bibliographic Data

ID9620893
AuthorsMichael J Watkins (University of Toronto, corresponding author), Endel Tulving (University of Toronto)
Year1978
Volume69
Issue4
Pages443-450
Publication date1978-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.2044-8295.1978.tb02121.x
OpenAlexW2083108829
LanguageEN

Does presenting a hint, or retrieval cue, for recall of an event change the memory trace for the event even when the cue does not in fact produce recall? An experiment by McLeod, Williams & Broadbent (1971) suggests that it may. A conclusion to this effect would have important theoretical implications. In particular, it would pose difficulties for specifying trace structure. McLeod et al. observed that a retrieval cue was more effective if its target trace had been previously cued, even though this cueing did not elicit recall. Three experiments are described which indicate that this result occurs only if the first, ineffectual cue is presented along with the second cue; if the second cue is presented alone it is less effective than the first. It is concluded that there is currently no evidence that the unsuccessful cueing of an item causes a change in its memory trace

Cognitive psychology · Cued recall · Cued speech · Engram · Event (particle physics) · Free recall · Linguistics · Recall · TRACE (psycholinguistics) · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Memory Processes and Influences · Psychology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae