Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Notes on Nicomachean Ethics 1173 a 2–5

Bibliographic Data

ID9665012
AuthorsGösta Grönroos (0000-0002-8426-8156, Stockholm University, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume66
Issue2
Pages484-490
Publication date2016-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0009838816000586
OpenAlexW2510654112
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited2

In Nicomachean Ethics (= Eth. Nic. ) 10.2, Aristotle addresses Eudoxus' argument that pleasure is the chief good in his characteristically dialectical manner. The argument is that pleasure is the chief good, since all creatures, rational (ἔλλογα) and non-rational (ἄλογα) alike, are perceived to aim at pleasure (1172 b 9–11). At 1172 b 35–1173 a 5, Aristotle turns to an objection against Eudoxus' argument. For some object (οἱ δ’ἐνιστάμενοι) to the argument by questioning one of its premisses, namely that what all creatures aim at is the good (1172 b 12–15). Instead, they claim that what all creatures aim at is not good (ὡς οὐκ ἀγαθὸν οὗ πάντ’ ἐφίεται, 1172 b 36). This claim is reasonably taken to mean that not everything that all creatures aim at is good. But, as we shall shortly see, Aristotle dismisses it in a way suggesting a less charitable interpretation. At any rate, the significance of this objection is that it challenges the strong claim that what all creatures aim at is the good with an argument against the weaker claim that what all creatures aim at is good (or a good). For if the weaker claim is refuted, then the strong claim is refuted as well. Aristotle takes issue with the argument against the weaker claim, but without committing himself to the strong claim

Argument (complex analysis · Creatures · Dialectic · Epistemology · Form of the Good · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Natural (archaeology · Object (grammar · Pleasure · Chemistry · Classical Philosophy and Thought · History · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Aristotle and Eudoxus on the Argument from Contraries

    Wei Cheng•Archiv für Geschichte der…•2020

  • Aristotle on Speusippus on Eudoxus on Pleasure

    James Warren•Oxford studies in ancient…•2009

  • Wish, Motivation and the Human Good in Aristotle

    Gösta Grönroos•Phronesis•2014

Citations per year0.17
Citation span2020 - 2020 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae