Corporate Self‐policing and the Environment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9680097 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul B Stretesky (0000-0001-5927-1882, Colorado State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 671-708 |
| Publication date | 2006-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Criminology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-1384 • E-ISSN: 1745-9125 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00060.x |
| OpenAlex | W2074911562 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 32 |
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Self‐Policing Policy (more commonly referred to as the Audit Policy) waives or reduces penalties when regulated entities voluntarily discover, disclose, and correct environmental violations. This study draws upon a rational choice model of corporate crime to determine if traditional regulatory efforts such as inspections and enforcement actions are associated with the odds of disclosing an environmental violation under the Audit Policy. A case control design is used to compare companies that self‐police to companies that do not self‐police. The event group consists of all 551 companies that disclosed at least one environmental violation under the Audit Policy between October 1, 1998 and September 30, 2000. The control group consists of a simple random sample of 551 companies that did not use the Audit Policy but were discovered to have violated at least one environmental law during the same time period as the event group. There is no evidence that inspections and enforcement increase Audit Policy use. However, the results do suggest, first, that the Audit Policy is more likely to be used by large companies than by small companies and, second, that it is likely to be used for reporting violations as opposed to more serious emissions or permit violations. In terms of public policy these findings suggest that regulatory agencies such as the EPA can do relatively little to increase the self‐policing of environmental violations
Agency (philosophy · Audit · Business · Economics · Enforcement · Environmental policy · Environmental resource management · Law enforcement · Odds · Political science · Sample (material · Accounting · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Law · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Corporate Characteristics, Political Embeddedness and Environmental Pollution by Large U.S. Corporations
Stealing Like Artists
Sanctioning corporate crime
Reengaging Criminology in Regulation and Governance
White-Collar Crime
Criminology and Corporate Crime
The criminalization of environmental harm
Anticipating the Anthropocene and greening criminology
Does self-policing reduce chemical emissions
Situational Crime Prevention and the Ecological Regulation of Green Crime
Coal Strip Mining, Mountaintop Removal, and the Distribution of Environmental Violations across the United States, 2002–2008
Duties to Distrust
Testing the Assumptions of History‐Dependent Approaches to Regulation
Does the Modernization of Environmental Enforcement Reduce Toxic Releases? An Examination of Self-policing, Criminal Prosecutions, and Toxic Releases in the United States, 1988-2014
Editors' Pick
Similarities between green criminology and green science
De la green criminology à l’analyse de la gestion différentielle des illégalismes
Pinpointing Persistent Polluters
The Neglect of Quantitative Research in Green Criminology and Its Consequences
Green and Grey
Does the Concentration of the Treadmill of Production Predict US EPA Environmental Violations Across States? A Test of Green Criminological Propositions from Ecological Disorganization Theory
Do organizational and political-legal arrangements explain financial wrongdoing
Regression Diagnostics
Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control
Non‐Mandatory Approaches to Environmental Protection
An Experiment in Voluntary Environmental Regulation
Self‐Regulation and Social Welfare
Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention
EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program
What Improves Environmental Compliance? Evidence from Mexican Industry
Desire for Control
Investment in Energy Efficiency
Panel Data Analysis of Regulatory Factors Shaping Environmental Performance
Big field, small potatoes
Rewards and Regulation
Deterrence
The Deterrent Effect of Antitrust Enforcement
Deterring Corporate Crime
Rush to Judgment
Organizational Size and Pollution
Can Government Facilitate Cooperation? An Informational Model of Osha Enforcement
The Decomposition of Antitrust
Sanction Threats and Appeals to Morality
Testing an Expected Utility Model of Corporate Deterrence
Rational Choice, Situated Action, and the Social Control of Organizations
Efficiently Studying Rare Events
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,29 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2025 (17) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |