Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Gender and Imprisonment Decisions

Bibliographic Data

ID9680124
AuthorsDarrell Steffensmeier (0000-0001-5642-0846, Pennsylvania State University, corresponding author), John H Kramer (0000-0002-2917-8297, Pennsylvania State University), John Kramer, Cathy Streifel (Purdue University West Lafayette)
Year1993
Volume31
Issue3
Pages411-446
Publication date1993-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCriminology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0011-1384 • E-ISSN: 1745-9125
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01136.x
OpenAlexW2063579219
LanguageEN
Citations received231
References cited35

Guidelines sentencing data from Pennsylvania for the years 1985–1987 are analyzed to assess the influence of gender on judges' imprisonment decisions. These data provide detailed information on offense severity and prior record, permit statistical controls for other variables thought to affect imprisonment decisions, cover a fairly comprehensive list of common‐law offenses (with adequate sample size), and contain judges' dispositional‐departure reasons for sentences outside the guidelines schema. The data—analyzed with additive and interactive models–indicate that gender (net of other factors) has a small effect on the likelihood of imprisonment toward lesser jailing of female defendants but has a negligible effect on the length‐of‐imprisonment decision. Observations and interview responses from selected judges help to clarify the ways in which judges' sentencing practices are gender linked. Together, the statistical and the qualitative data suggest that the sentencing practices of judges are driven by two main concerns, blameworthiness (e.g., as indicated by prior record, type of involvement, remorse) and practicality (e.g., as indicated by child‐care responsibility, pregnancy, emotional or physical problems, availability of adequate jail space). Based on our findings, we suspect that when men and women appear in (contemporary) criminal court in similar circumstances and are charged with similar offenses, they receive similar treatment. A major question from a policy perspective is, when gender disparities in sentence outcomes do arise, are the disparities warranted or unwarranted

Audit · Criminology · Imprisonment · Perspective (graphical · Remorse · Sentence · Suspect · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Gendered social forces

    Shabnam Javdani, Naomi Sadeh et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2011

  • Punishment without reason

    Eyal Aharoni, Alan J Fridlund•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2012

  • Focal Concerns Theory

    Open Access•Richard D Hartley•Encyclopedia of Theoretical…•2014

  • Sentencing, Trends, and Disparities

    Open Access•Mindy S Bradley, J T Ulmer•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Youth Justice and Migration

    Open Access•Olga Petintseva•Youth Justice and Migration•2018

  • Marriage and Desistance from Crime in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Bianca E Bersani, John H Laub et al.•Journal of Quantitative Criminology•2009

  • Racial and ethnic disparity in pretrial criminal processing

    Traci Schlesinger•Justice Quarterly•2005

  • Does Gender Modify the Effects of Race–ethnicity on Criminal Sanctioning? Sentences for Male and Female White, Black, and Hispanic Defendants

    Open Access•Darrell Steffensmeier, Stephen Demuth•Journal of Quantitative Criminology•2006

  • A Multilevel Test of Minority Threat Effects on Sentencing

    Open Access•Xia Wang, Daniel P Mears•Journal of Quantitative Criminology•2010

  • A Multilevel Analysis of Community Effects on Criminal Sentencing

    Noelle E Fearn•Justice Quarterly•2005

  • The Independent and Joint Effects of Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Age on Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts

    Jill K Doerner, Stephen Demuth•Justice Quarterly•2010

  • Gender and Sentencing in the Federal Courts

    Open Access•Jill K Doerner, Stephen Demuth•Criminal Justice Policy Review•2014

  • White female victims and death penalty disparity research

    JEFFERSON E HOLCOMB, MARIAN R WILLIAMS et al.•Justice Quarterly•2004

  • Does Victim Gender Increase Sentence Severity? Further Explorations of Gender Dynamics and Sentencing Outcomes

    Open Access•Theodore R Curry, Gang Lee et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2004

  • The Individual And Joint Effects Of Race, Gender, And Family Status On Juvenile Justice Decision-Making

    Open Access•Michael J Leiber, Kristin Y Mack•Journal of Research in Crime and…•2003

  • Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions

    Chester L Britt, Chester Britt•Justice Quarterly•2000

  • Focally Concerned About Focal Concerns

    Mona Lynch•Justice Quarterly•2019

  • Age differences in sentencing

    Darrell Steffensmeier, John H Kramer et al.•Justice Quarterly•1995

  • Sex effects and sentencing

    Kathleen Daly, Rebecca L Bordt•Justice Quarterly•1995

  • Is Preferential Treatment of Female Offenders a Thing of the Past? A Multisite Study of Gender, Race, and Imprisonment

    Open Access•Cassia Spohn, Dawn Beichner et al.•Criminal Justice Policy Review•2000

  • Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines

    John H Kramer, J T Ulmer•Justice Quarterly•1996

  • Women Coming Home

    Beth M Huebner, Christina Dejong et al.•Justice Quarterly•2010

  • Discrimination, drugs, and alcohol among Latina/os in Brooklyn, New York

    Open Access•Angie Denisse Otiniano Verissimo, Gilbert Gee et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2013

  • Gender and sentencing in capital cases

    Bin Liang, Hong Lu et al.•Psychology, Crime & Law•2026

  • Bias in Sentencing Men for Sexual Offenses Against Minors

    Open Access•Shawn M Rolfe, Bruce Rind et al.•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2025

  • Sentencing equilibrium in rape cases

    Open Access•Moulin Xiong, Yiwei Xia et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Did she do it? Assessing culpability among a true crime audience

    Open Access•Meghan Sacks, Amy Shlosberg•SN Social Sciences•2022

  • Deservingness and Punishment in Juvenile Justice

    Open Access•Steven N Zane, Joshua C Cochran et al.•Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice•2022

  • Examining the “Gang Penalty” in the Juvenile Justice System

    Open Access•D’andre Walker, Gabriel T Cesar•Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice•2020

  • A failed attempt to radically reduce inter-court sentencing disparities by legislation

    Open Access•Kamil Mamak, Joanna Dudek et al.•European Journal of Criminology•2022

  • Exploring gender disparities in the prosecution of theft cases

    Open Access•Fredericke Leuschner•European Journal of Criminology•2023

  • Developing a Complete Sentence Severity Scale using Extended Goodman RC models

    Open Access•Stephanie Wallace, Brian Francis•Journal of Quantitative Criminology•2024

  • Adverse Childhood Experiences in Capital Sentencing

    Open Access•Tyler J Vaughan, Lisa Bell Holleran•Justice Quarterly•2023

  • Back to Basics

    J T Ulmer, E Silver et al.•Justice Quarterly•2023

  • Expanding Our Understanding of Focal Concerns

    Miranda A Galvin, J T Ulmer•Justice Quarterly•2022

  • The Focal Concerns of Stalking Victims

    Open Access•Patrick Q Brady, Bradford W Reyns•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2024

  • Between Paternalism and a Gender Perspective

    Open Access•Miguel Quintana-Navarrete, Gustavo Fondevila•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2025

  • Pathways to Offense Charging

    Open Access•Tri Keah S Henry, Howard Henderson•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2023

  • A Focal Concerns Perspective on Prosecutorial Decision Making in Cases of Intimate Partner Stalking

    Open Access•Patrick Q Brady, Bradford W Reyns•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2020

  • Immigration and Sentencing

    Open Access•Jeffrey S Nowacki, Bria Willert et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2026

  • Determinants of case outcomes in Rwanda's postgenocide gacaca courts

    Open Access•Hollie Nyseth Nzitatira, Jared Edgerton et al.•Criminology•2026

  • A Quantitative Analysis on the Sentencing Disparity in Online Romance Scam Cases in United States

    Open Access•Fangzhou Wang•Crime & Delinquency•2025

  • Examining the Sentencing of American Indian Women in U.S. Federal District Courts

    Open Access•Kelsey L Kramer, Shamika M Kelley•Crime & Delinquency•2024

  • Sentencing Disparity and Focal Concern

    Open Access•Fangzhou Wang•Crime & Delinquency•2025

  • Sentencing Add-Ons and Implications for Disparities in a Guidelines State

    Open Access•C Clare Strange, Joshua C Cochran et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2022

  • Race and Gender Differences in the Age-Sentencing Relationship

    Open Access•J T Ulmer, Rob Bowman•Crime & Delinquency•2025

  • Going Off the Grid

    Open Access•Katrina Cole, Jason Rydberg et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2021

  • Examining Disparities in Case Dispositions and Sentencing Outcomes for Domestic Violent Extremists in the United States

    Open Access•Jeff Gruenewald, Brent R Klein et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2024

  • Predictive Bias in Juvenile Risk Assessment

    Open Access•Kristina K Childs, Jennifer H Peck et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2024

  • Social Context and Early Disposition Departures

    Open Access•Bria Willert, Jeffrey S Nowacki•Crime & Delinquency•2025

  • Gender Disparity in Pennsylvania Child Abuse and Neglect Sentencing Outcomes

    Open Access•Lily Hanrath, Sarah A Font et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2020

  • Time for Time

    Open Access•Lin Liu, Rebecca Richardson et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2022

  • Legal and Extralegal Factors Determining Sentence Type and Length

    Open Access•Alyssa M Sheeran•Crime & Delinquency•2025

  • Gender and Criminal Justice Responses to Terrorism in the United States

    Open Access•Summer Jackson, Katie Ratcliff et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2023

  • Specialty Courts, Special for Whom

    Open Access•Brittany J Hood, Augustine Tarkom•Race and Justice•2026

  • Sentencing Female Drug Offenders

    Matthew S Crow, Julie C Kunselman•Women & Criminal Justice•2009

  • Fast-Tracking Justice

    Melanie M Holland•Women & Criminal Justice•2020

  • Regulating Legal Misconduct in the Commonwealth of Virginia

    Brian K Payne, Victoria M Time et al.•Women & Criminal Justice•2004

  • The Joint Effects of Gender and Race/Ethnicity on Sentencing Outcomes in Federal Courts

    Jill K Doerner•Women & Criminal Justice•2015

  • Women in Crime and Justice

    Edna Erez, YAEL HASSIN•Women & Criminal Justice•1997

  • A Descriptive Profile and Socio-Historical Analysis of Female Executions in the United States

    David V Baker•Women & Criminal Justice•1999

  • Gender and “Other People's Money”

    Kristy Holtfreter•Women & Criminal Justice•2013

  • Gender Disparities in Sentencing Departures

    Jill K Doerner•Women & Criminal Justice•2012

  • Gender and Case Processing Decisions

    Cassia Spohn, Cassia C Spohn et al.•Women & Criminal Justice•1997

  • Do Both Petty and Serious Female Offenders Have Shorter Incarcerations than Their Male Counterparts? Testing the Universality of Chivalrous Treatment

    Lin Liu, Ronet Bachman et al.•Women & Criminal Justice•2023

  • The Non-Constant Effect of Defendant Sex across Criminal History

    Bryan Holme, EBONY RUHLAND•Women & Criminal Justice•2025

  • Achieving Consistency in Sentencing

    Lyndon Harris•Achieving Consistency in Sentencing•2022

  • Perceptions of Female Offenders

    Open Access•Brenda Russell, Brenda L Russell•Perceptions of Female Offenders•2013

  • Judges' Race and Judicial Decision Making

    Open Access•Darrell Steffensmeier, Chester L Britt et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2001

  • The Political Context of Sentencing

    R Helms, Ronald G Helms et al.•Social Forces•2002

  • Reassessing and Redirecting Research on Race and Sentencing

    Eric P Baumer•Justice Quarterly•2012

  • Recent Developments and New Directions in Sentencing Research

    J T Ulmer•Justice Quarterly•2011

  • “But Some People Still Think That Men Cannot be Raped”

    Open Access•Eunice Carmo, Daniel Cardoso et al.•International Journal of Sexual…•2025

  • Somebody’s going to emergency, somebody’s going to jail

    Open Access•Kyle Mclean, Emily Suiter et al.•Health & Justice•2026

  • Examining Mental Health Court Completion

    Open Access•B Ray, Cindy Brooks Dollar•Sociological Quarterly•2013

  • The Liberation Hypothesis and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Application of California's Three Strikes Law

    Elsa Y Chen•Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal…•2008

  • The influence of race, gender, family, and employment status on probationer sanctioning for noncompliance

    Danielle M Romain•Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal…•2020

  • Gender Effects Across Place

    Open Access•Melanie M Holland, Ariane Prohaska•Race and Justice•2021

  • The Influence of Defendant Race/Ethnicity and Police Body-Worn Cameras on Traffic Case Processing

    Open Access•Jessica Huff, Michael D White et al.•Race and Justice•2023

  • Decomposition of Racial Differences in Sentencing

    Steven C Bourassa, Viviana Andreescu•Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal…•2009

  • Mais lenientes com as mulheres? O fluxo de processamento do tráfico de drogas numa cidade brasileira

    Open Access•Ludmila Ribeiro•Novos Estudos - CEBRAP•2022

  • Similar cases, different punishment

    Open Access•Hester de Boer, O M J Nuyts et al.•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2026

  • Penalty effect of China's Plea Leniency System

    Open Access•Zebiao Shao, Qiong Wu•International journal of law,…•2025

  • The Impact of Indigenous Status on Adult Sentencing

    Samantha Jeffries, Christine E W Bond et al.•Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal…•2012

  • Kaznovanje tujcev

    Open Access•Mojca M Plesničar, Jaka Kukavica•Two Homelands•2019

  • Gender, Race, and Sentencing

    Kathleen Daly, Michael Tonry•Crime and Justice•1997

  • Narrativas y control de la detención policial en la CDMX

    Open Access•Carlos Silva Forné•Revista Mexicana de Sociología•2024

  • Evidence of cumulative disadvantage and the liberation hypothesis in court cases involving resisting arrest

    Open Access•Rebecca Richardson, Pauline K Brennan•Journal of Criminal Justice•2025

  • Temporal analyses of American Indian disadvantage

    Open Access•Erica Redner-Vera, Erica N Redner-Vera•Journal of Criminal Justice•2025

  • The ‘Focal Concerns’ of Parole Board Decision-Making

    Shannon Buglar•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•2016

  • Sex and Sentencing Disparity in South Australia's Higher Courts

    Samantha Jeffries, Christine E W Bond et al.•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•2010

  • Measuring Risk and Blameworthiness in the Sentencing of Criminal Defendants

    Christine E W Bond, Christine Bond et al.•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•2011

  • Indigent Injustice

    Open Access•Sarah Clarke, Samantha A Zottola et al.•Critical Criminology•2024

  • Sex/gender‐based decision‐making in the criminal justice system as a possible (additional) explanation for the underrepresentation of women in official criminal statistics — a review of international literature

    Johan Goethals, Ernest Maes et al.•International Journal of…•1997

  • The Iron Law of Paternalism

    Open Access•Dan R Dalton, Jonathan L Johnson•Psychological Reports•1995

  • Amplifying Black Women’s Voices

    Open Access•Cynthia Mackey•Journal of Racial and Ethnic…•2026

  • The impact of maleness on judicial decision making

    Rebecca D Gill, M Kagan et al.•Politics Groups and Identities•2017

  • You Know Baseball? 3 Strikes”

    Open Access•Danielle M Romain•Social Sciences•2021

  • The Effects of Legal and Extralegal Factors on Probation Revocation Decisions

    Open Access•P J Verrecchia, Eric Ling•International Journal of…•2013

  • Political pressure and information bias in arrests hearings in Mexico city

    Open Access•Carlos Silva Forné, Alejandra Armesto•International journal of law,…•2024

  • Regression Diagnostics

    Open Access•David A Belsley, Edwin Kuh et al.•Regression diagnostics•1980

  • Assessing the Impact of the Women's Movement on Sex-Based Differences in the Handling of Adult Criminal Defendants

    Open Access•Darrell Steffensmeier, Darrell J Steffensmeier•Crime & Delinquency•1980

  • The Anatomy of Another Prison Riot

    Open Access•Israel L Barak-Glantz•The Prison Journal•1983

  • Women in Crime and Justice

    Edna Erez, YAEL HASSIN•Women & Criminal Justice•1997

  • The sentencing commission and its guidelines

    Open Access•Andrew Von Hirsch, Michael Tonry et al.•The sentencing commission and its…•1987

  • The Social Contexts of Criminal Sentencing

    Open Access•Martha A Myers, Martha A Myers Braxton M Alfred et al.•Social Contexts of Criminal…•1987

  • Class, Status, and the Punishment of White-Collar Criminals

    Open Access•David Weisburd, ELIN WARING et al.•Law & Social Inquiry•1990

  • Crime and Justice

    Anne Rankin Mahoney, M Tonry et al.•Teaching Sociology•1987

  • Research on Sentencing

    G Lafree, Gary D Lafree et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1984

  • The Legal System

    Open Access•Donald M Roper•Political Science Quarterly•1976

  • The Impact of the Ethnicity and Gender of Defendants on the Decision to Reject or Dismiss Felony Charges

    Open Access•Cassia Spohn, John Gruhl et al.•Criminology•1987

  • Judicial Discretion and Defendant's Sex

    Open Access•Debra A Curran•Criminology•1983

  • Sex, Sentencing and Reconvigtion

    David P Farrington, ALLISON M MORRIS•The British Journal of Criminology•1983

  • Measuring and explaining disparities in felony sentences

    Open Access•James L Croyle•Political Behavior•1983

  • Changing Conceptions of Race

    Ruth D Peterson, J Hagan•American Sociological Review•1984

  • An Introduction to Sample Selection Bias in Sociological Data

    Richard A Berk•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Sentencing the White-Collar Offender

    Stanton Wheeler, David Weisburd et al.•American Sociological Review•1982

  • Sentencing the White-Collar Offender

    Michael L Benson, Esteban Walker•American Sociological Review•1988

  • The Sex-Sanctioning Issue

    Candace Kruttschnitt, Donald E Green•American Sociological Review•1984

  • The Effect of Race on Sentencing

    Open Access•Cassia Spohn, John Gruhl et al.•Law & Society Review•1982

  • Social Status and Sentences of Female Offenders

    Open Access•Candace Kruttschnitt•Law & Society Review•1981

  • Women as Criminal Defendants

    Open Access•John Gruhl, Susan Welch et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1984

  • Discrimination in the Criminal Courts

    Kathleen Daly•Social Forces•1987

  • An Integration of Theories to Explain Judicial Discretion

    Celesta A Albonetti•Social Problems•1991

  • Racial Differences in Criminal Processing

    Open Access•Terance D Miethe, Charles A Moore•Sociological Quarterly•1986

  • The Role of Probation Officers in Determining Gender Differences in Sentencing Severity

    Open Access•Charles E Frazier, E Wilbur Bock et al.•Sociological Quarterly•1983

Unique citing works231
Citations per year7,45
Citation span1995 - 2026 (32)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 229

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae