Socioeconomic Status, the Home Language Environment, Noise Exposure, and the Mismatch Response in Infancy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9685977 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katrina R Simon (0000-0001-8148-5035, Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University New York City New York USA), Belen Azofra Macarron (Universite Paris Cité Paris France), Aislinn Sandre (0000-0003-2317-0929, University of Western Ontario London Ontario Canada), Melina Amarante (Fordham University New York City New York USA), Sonya V Troller‐Renfree (0000-0001-9979-4696, Teachers College Columbia University New York City New York USA), Kimberly G Noble (0000-0003-1496-5113, Teachers College Columbia University New York City New York USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | e70128-e70128 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Developmental Psychobiology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-1630 • E-ISSN: 1098-2302 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/dev.70128 |
| PMID | 41619203 |
| OpenAlex | W7126465781 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 78 |
Socioeconomic resources have long been associated with children's language development. Several proximal factors have been suggested as candidate mechanisms underlying socioeconomic disparities in language development, including differences in the home language environment and home noise levels. These experiences may in part shape auditory discrimination skills, a key component of language comprehension. To index early auditory discrimination, researchers measured brain function in relation to the detection of different sounds with an event‐related potential (ERP) called the mismatch response (MMR). The current study aimed to examine associations among socioeconomic circumstances, the home language environment, home noise exposure, and the MMR in a socioeconomically, racially, and ethnically diverse longitudinal sample of 6‐ and 12‐month‐old infants. Socioeconomic circumstances were measured prenatally via parent report. The home language environment and home noise levels were measured using digital language processing devices when infants were approximately 6 months of age. The MMR was elicited during a passive auditory oddball task at two timepoints—6 and 12 months of age. Results showed that neither SES, the home language environment, nor home noise levels predicted infant MMR at either age. These findings add to a growing body of literature examining the role of distal and proximal factors in shaping infant brain activity related to language development
Language development · Longitudinal study · Noise (video) · Poison control · Social class · Socioeconomic status · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Language Development and Disorders · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Williams Syndrome Research
SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months
Socioeconomic Status and Health
The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing
Beyond the 30-Million-Word Gap
Teaching by Listening
Language Experience in the Second Year of Life and Language Outcomes in Late Childhood
Talking to Children Matters
A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role of Quantity and Quality of Child-Directed Speech in Vocabulary Development
Eeglab
Environmental noise, brain structure, and language development in children
Socioeconomic Disparities in Language Input Are Associated With Children's Language-Related Brain Structure and Reading Skills
Associations Between Maternal Stress, Early Language Behaviors, and Infant Electroencephalography During the First Year of Life
Relations among Socioeconomic Status, Perceived Stress, and the Home Language Environment
Mismatched response predicts behavioral speech discrimination outcomes in infants with hearing loss and normal hearing
Identifying Pathways Between Socioeconomic Status and Language Development
Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |