Racial Integration and Devaluation
Reply to Stanley, Valls, Basevich, Merry, and Sundstrom
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9687635 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D C Matthews (0000-0003-1093-6809, York University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 85-94 |
| Publication date | 2023-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217322000324 |
| OpenAlex | W4377832764 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 8 |
In “Racial Integration and the Problem of Relational Devaluation,” I argue that blacks should reject racial integration on self-protective and solidarity grounds. Integration will intensify the self-worth harms of stigmatization and phenotypic devaluation by leading blacks to more fully internalize their devaluation, and while the integrating process itself might reduce the former, it may well leave in place the latter. In this paper, I reply to the challenges to these arguments presented by Sharon Stanley, Andrew Valls, Elvira Basevich, Michael Merry, and Ronald Sundstrom
Devaluation · Economics · Macroeconomics · Political science · Sociology · Solidarity · Employment and Welfare Studies · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
The Gender Politics of Physical Beauty and Racial Integration
Racial Integration, Cost-Benefit Analysis, and Philosophical Humility
Racial Integration and the Problem of Relational Devaluation
Integration and Reaction
Racial Integration and Devaluation
Racial Justice and Resistance to Integration
Doth He Protest Too Much? Thoughts on Matthew's Black Devaluation Thesis
After virtue
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |