Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Knowledge across Contexts. A Problem for Subject-Sensitive Invariantism

Bibliographic Data

ID9688879
AuthorsPeter Baumann (0000-0003-0991-6288, Swarthmore College, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume55
Issue2
Pages363-380
Publication date2016-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDialogue (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0012217316000317
OpenAlexW2423842017
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited25

The possibility of knowledge attributions across contexts (where attributor and subject find themselves in different epistemic contexts) can create serious problems for certain views of knowledge. Amongst such views is subject-sensitive invariantism—the view that knowledge is determined not only by epistemic factors (belief, truth, evidence, etc.), but also by non-epistemic factors (practical interests, etc.). I argue that subject-sensitive invariantism either runs into a contradiction or has to make very implausible assumptions. The problem has been very much neglected but is so serious that one should look for alternative accounts of knowledge

Attribution · Contradiction · Epistemology · Sociology · Subject (documents) · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • What's a(t) stake? On stakes, encroachers, knowledge

    Open Access•Peter Baumann•Theoria•2024

  • Knowledge and Lotteries

    John Hawthorne•Knowledge and lotteries•2003

  • Knowledge and Practical Interests

    Jason Stanley•KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICAL INTERESTS.•2005

  • Knowledge and its Limits

    T Williamson•Knowledge and Its Limits•2002

  • Knowledge in an Uncertain World

    Jeremy Fantl, Morag Mcgrath et al.•Knowledge in an uncertain world•2009

  • Knowledge and Action

    John Hawthorne, Jason Stanley et al.•The Journal of Philosophy•2008

  • Epistemic Operators

    Fred I Dretske, Fred Dretske•The Journal of Philosophy•1970

  • Knowing Our Own Minds

    Crispin Wright, Barry C Smith et al.•Knowing our own minds•2000

  • Consuming knowledge claims across contexts

    Open Access•Emil Frederik Lundbjerg Moeller•Synthese•2015

  • Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification

    Jeremy Fantl, Morag Mcgrath et al.•The Philosophical Review•2002

  • Solving the Skeptical Problem

    Keith Derose•The Philosophical Review•1995

  • Subject Sensitive Invariantism

    Martijn Blaauw•The Philosophical Quarterly•2008

  • Contextualism, Hawthorne's Invariantism and Third-Person Cases

    Anthony Brueckner•The Philosophical Quarterly•2005

  • Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Knowledge of Knowledge

    T Williamson•The Philosophical Quarterly•2005

  • The Case Against Purity

    Open Access•Ram Neta•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2012

  • Replies to Cohen, Neta and Reed

    Open Access•Jeremy Fantl, Morag Mcgrath et al.•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2012

  • Contextualism, Subject‐Sensitive Invariantism, and the Interaction of ‘Knowledge’‐Ascriptions with Modal and Temporal Operators

    Open Access•Michael Blome-Tillmann, Michael Blome‐tillmann•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2009

  • Contextualism and the Factivity Problem

    Open Access•Peter Baumann•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2008

  • Anti‐intellectualism and the Knowledge‐Action Principle

    Open Access•Ram Neta•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2007

  • Contextualism and Scepticism

    Crispin Wright•The Philosophical Quarterly•2005

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae