L'éthique du discours et le problème de la connaissance morale
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9689274 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stéphane Courtois (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 251-278 |
| Publication date | 2002-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217300013895 |
| OpenAlex | W1968913209 |
| Language | FR |
| References cited | 11 |
The aim of this article is to assess the coherence of the metaethical positions on which discourse ethics as developed by Habermas and Apel rests. After showing that one is faced here with a non-descriptivist, anti-realist but cognitivist moral theory, I examine whether a non-descriptivist cognitivism, on the one hand, and an anti-realist cognitivism, on the other hand, can consistently be held. I maintain that the problem of the relation between cognitivism and non-descriptivism is adequately solved by the two authors, but that the problem of the relation between cognitivism and anti-realism is still waiting for an appropriate answer, which I put forth in my article
Cognition · Cognitivism (psychology) · Discourse ethics · Epistemology · Humanities · Sociology · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |