Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparative Analysis of Litigation Systems

An Auction‐Theoretic Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID9703018
AuthorsMichael R Baye (Indiana University), Dan Kovenock (0009-0001-8823-9547, Purdue University), Casper G de Vries (Erasmus University Rotterdam and Tinbergen Institute)
Year2005
Volume115
Issue505
Pages583-601
Publication date2005-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Economic Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0133 • E-ISSN: 1468-0297
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01010.x
OpenAlexW3123110289
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited19

A simple auction-theoretic framework is used to examine symmetric litigation environments where the legal ownership of a disputed asset is unknown to the court. The court observes only the quality of the case presented by each party, and awards the asset to the party presenting the best case. Rational litigants influence the quality of their cases by hiring skilful attorneys. This framework permits us to compare the equilibrium legal expenditures that arise under a continuum of legal systems. The British rule, Continental rule, American rule, and some recently proposed legal reforms are special cases of our model

Art history · Erasmus · Law and economics · Library science · Sociology · Auction Theory and Applications · Computer Science · History · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Merger and Competition Analysis

  • Uncertainty of Law and the Legal Process

    Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe Dari‐mattiacci et al.•Journal of Institutional and…•2007

  • Wars of Conquest and Independence

    Hadi Yektaş, Roland Hodler et al.•Journal of Institutional and…•2019

  • A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments

    Open Access•Emmanuel Dechenaux, Dan Kovenock et al.•Experimental Economics•2015

  • Do fee-shifting rules affect plaintiffs’ win rates? A theoretical and empirical analysis

    Open Access•Gabriel Doménech-Pascual, Gabriel Doménech Pascual et al.•International Review of Law and…•2021

  • Simple analytics of the impact of terror generation on attacker–defender interactions

    Open Access•Timothy Mathews, Aniruddha Bagchi et al.•Public Choice•2019

  • A generalized Tullock contest

    Open Access•Subhasish M Chowdhury, Roman M Sheremeta•Public Choice•2011

  • Deterrence, settlement, and litigation under adversarial versus inquisitorial systems

    Open Access•Alice Guerra, Maria Maraki et al.•Public Choice•2023

  • Nine points of the law

    Open Access•Karl Wärneryd•Public Choice•2012

  • All-pay-all aspects of political decision making

    Open Access•Thomas Giebe, Paul Schweinzer•Public Choice•2014

  • Tullock’s contest with reimbursements

    Open Access•Alexander Matros, Daniel Armanios•Public Choice•2009

  • How (Not) to Raise Money

    Jacob K Goeree, Emiel Maasland et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2005

  • Optimal reimbursement schemes in contests

    Open Access•Subhasish M Chowdhury, Chen Cohen et al.•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•2025

  • Optimal Auction Design

    Open Access•Roger B Myerson, Roger Myerson•Mathematics of Operations Research•1981

Unique citing works12
Citations per year0,57
Citation span2005 - 2025 (21)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae