Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Decision Times Reveal Private Information in Strategic Settings

Evidence from Bargaining Experiments

Bibliographic Data

ID9708385
AuthorsArkady Konovalov (0000-0002-9448-6659, The Ohio State University, USA, University of Zurich, Switzerland & University of Birmingham , UK), Ian Krajbich (0000-0001-6618-5675, The Ohio State University and University of California, Los Angeles , USA, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume133
Issue656
Pages3007-3033
Publication date2023-10-06
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Economic Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0133 • E-ISSN: 1468-0297
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ej/uead055
OpenAlexW4385234206
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited108

People respond quickly when they have a clear preference and slowly when they are close to indifference. The question is whether others exploit this tendency to infer private information. In two-stage bargaining experiments, we observe that the speed with which buyers reject sellers’ offers decreases with the size of the foregone surplus. This should allow sellers to infer buyers’ values from response times, creating an incentive for buyers to manipulate their response times. We experimentally identify distinct conditions under which subjects do, and do not, exhibit such strategic behaviour. These results provide the first insight into the possible use of response time as a strategic variable

Business · Economics · Exploit · Incentive · Microeconomics · Preference · Private information retrieval · Strategic interaction · Variable (mathematics · Auction Theory and Applications · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies

  • A rational model of people’s inferences about others’ preferences based on response times

    Open Access•Vael Gates, Frederick Callaway et al.•Cognition•2021

  • Decision field theory

    Jerome R Busemeyer, James T Townsend•Psychological Review•1993

  • Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games

    Open Access•Elizabeth Hoffman, Kevin McCabe et al.•Games and Economic Behavior•1994

  • Quantal Response Equilibria for Extensive Form Games

    Open Access•Richard D Mckelvey, Thomas R Palfrey•Experimental Economics•1998

  • Discounting Time and Time Discounting

    Open Access•Gal Zauberman, B Kyu Kim et al.•Journal of Marketing Research•2009

  • The Diffusion Decision Model

    Roger Ratcliff, Gail Mckoon•Neural Computation•2008

  • Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments

    Open Access•Daniel John Zizzo•Experimental Economics•2010

  • Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions

    Open Access•Ian Krajbich, Antonio Rangel•Proceedings of the National…•2011

  • The time course of perceptual choice

    Marius Usher, James L Mcclelland•Psychological Review•2001

  • Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice

    Open Access•Ralph Hertwig, Greg Barron et al.•Psychological Science•2004

  • Eliciting Risk and Time Preferences

    Open Access•Steffen Andersen, Glenn W Harrison et al.•Econometrica•2008

  • Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice

    Open Access•Ian Krajbich, Carrie Armel et al.•Nature Neuroscience•2010

  • Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects

    Charles A Holt, Susan K Laury•American Economic Review•2002

  • Z-Tree

    Open Access•Urs Fischbacher•Experimental Economics•2007

  • Psychological mechanisms of loss aversion

    Open Access•Wenjia Joyce Zhao, Lukasz Walasek et al.•Cognitive Psychology•2020

  • A rational model of people’s inferences about others’ preferences based on response times

    Open Access•Vael Gates, Frederick Callaway et al.•Cognition•2021

  • How Quick Decisions Illuminate Moral Character

    Open Access•Clayton R Critcher, Yoel Inbar et al.•Social Psychological and…•2013

  • The Driving Forces Behind the Rise of Experimental Economics

    Andrej Svorenčík•Review of Political Economy•2020

  • Who performs better under time pressure? Results from a field experiment

    Open Access•Maria De Paola, Francesca Gioia•Journal of Economic Psychology•2016

  • Ultimatum bargaining behavior

    Open Access•Werner Güth, Reinhard Tietz•Journal of Economic Psychology•1990

  • Time Will Tell

    Carlos Alós-Ferrer, Ernst Fehr et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2021

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis in Reasoning

    Larbi Chrifi‐Alaoui, Larbi Alaoui et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2021

  • Strategic Complexity and the Value of Thinking

    Open Access•David Gill, Victoria Prowse et al.•The Economic Journal•2023

  • Lottery Choice

    Nathaniel T Wilcox•The Economic Journal•1993

  • Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning

    Open Access•Ariel Rubinstein•The Economic Journal•2007

  • The effects of observed decision time on expectations of extremity and cooperation

    Open Access•Anthony M Evans, Philippe van de Calseyde et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2016

  • Effect of Response Time on Perceptions of Bargaining Outcomes

    Joydeep Srivastava, Shweta Oza•Journal of Consumer Research•2006

  • Explaining Bargaining Impasse

    Open Access•Linda Babcock, G Loewenstein•The Journal of Economic…•1997

Citations per year0.2
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae