Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Fourfold Pattern of Risk Attitudes in Choice and Pricing Tasks

Bibliographic Data

ID9708638
AuthorsWilliam T Harbaugh (0000-0002-4127-3983, University of Oregon and NBER), Kate Krause (0000-0001-9975-9866, University of New Mexico), Lise Vesterlund (University of Pittsburgh)
Year2010
Volume120
Issue545
Pages595-611
Publication date2010-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Economic Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0133 • E-ISSN: 1468-0297
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02312.x
OpenAlexW1898218319
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited29

We examine the robustness of the fourfold pattern of risk attitudes under two elicitation procedures. We find that individuals are, on average, risk-seeking over low-probability gains and high-probability losses and risk-averse over high-probability gains and low-probability losses when we elicit prices for the gambles. However, a choice-based elicitation procedure, where participants choose between a gamble and its expected value, yields individual decisions that are indistinguishable from random choice. Sensitivity to elicitation procedure holds between and within participants, and remains when participants are allowed to review and change decisions. The price elicitation procedure is more complex; this finding may be further evidence that an increase in cognitive load exacerbates behavioural anomalies. Copyright © The Author(s). Journal compilation © Royal Economic Society 2009

Actuarial science · Econometrics · Economics · Robustness (evolution · Statistics · Value (mathematics · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Mathematics · Psychology

  • Forecasting risk attitudes

    Open Access•Catherine C Eckel, Philip J Grossman•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•2008

  • Eliciting risk preferences

    Open Access•Chetan Dave, Catherine C Eckel et al.•Journal of Risk and Uncertainty•2010

  • Violence and Risk Preference

    Michael Callen, Mohammad Isaqzadeh et al.•American Economic Review•2014

  • Prospect theory in multiple price list experiments

    Open Access•Géraldine Bocquého, Julien Jacob et al.•Theory and Decision•2023

  • Consistency of Risk Preference Measures

    Pan He, Marcella Veronesi et al.•The Journal of Development Studies•2018

  • The Quest for Rationality

    Open Access•Stefan Schiller•SAGE Open•2017

  • The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

    Open Access•B Douglas Bernheim•Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis•2016

  • So when are you loss averse? Testing the S-shaped function in pricing and allocation tasks

    Open Access•Miki Malul, Mosi Rosenboim et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2013

  • Responsibility and limited liability in decision making for others – An experimental consideration

    Open Access•Sascha Füllbrunn, Wolfgang J Luhan•Journal of Economic Psychology•2020

  • The information inelasticity of habits

    Open Access•E L Khalil•Synthese•2022

  • On prospect theory, making choices for others, and the affective psychology of risk

    Open Access•Qingzhou Sun, Evan Polman et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2021

  • The risk elicitation puzzle

    Open Access•Andreas Pedroni, Renato Frey et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2017

  • On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function

    Open Access•Richard Gonzalez, George Wu•Cognitive Psychology•1999

  • Addiction and Cue-Triggered Decision Processes

    B Douglas Bernheim, Antonio Rangel•American Economic Review•2004

  • The Probability Weighting Function

    Drazen Prelec•Econometrica•1998

  • Who Is ‘Behavioral’? Cognitive Ability and Anomalous Preferences

    Open Access•Daniel J Benjamin, Sebastian A Brown et al.•Journal of the European Economic…•2013

  • Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data

    John D Hey, Chris Orme et al.•Econometrica•1994

  • A Dual-Self Model of Impulse Control

    Drew Fudenberg, David K Levine•American Economic Review•2006

  • Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•The Journal of Business•1986

  • Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking.

    Paul Slovic, Sarah Lichtenstein•Journal of Experimental…•1968

  • Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function

    Open Access•George Wu, G Y Wu et al.•Management Science•1996

  • Weighing risk and uncertainty.

    Amos Tversky, Craig R Fox•Psychological Review•1995

  • Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability

    Open Access•Colin F Camerer, Teck-Hua Ho•Journal of Risk and Uncertainty•1994

  • Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory

    Chris Starmer•Journal of Economic Literature•2000

  • Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice

    Open Access•Ralph Hertwig, Greg Barron et al.•Psychological Science•2004

  • Advances in prospect theory

    Open Access•Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Journal of Risk and Uncertainty•1992

  • Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects

    Charles A Holt, Susan K Laury•American Economic Review•2002

  • Prospect Theory

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Econometrica•1979

  • Choices, values, and frames

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•American Psychologist•1984

  • Choice Under Uncertainty

    Open Access•Mark J Machina•The Journal of Economic…•1987

Unique citing works12
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2008 - 2023 (16)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae