A Prize to Give for
An Experiment on Public Good Funding Mechanisms
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9711011 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luca Corazzini (0000-0002-0567-8457, University of Padua and Bocconi University), Marco Faravelli (0000-0001-9646-9126, University of St Andrews), Luca Stanca (0000-0003-2149-5658, University of Milan Bicocca) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 120 |
| Issue | 547 |
| Pages | 944-967 |
| Publication date | 2010-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Economic Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-0133 • E-ISSN: 1468-0297 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02314.x |
| OpenAlex | W1486525031 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 18 |
This article investigates fund-raising mechanisms based on a prize as a way to overcome free riding in the private provision of public goods. We focus on an environment characterised by income heterogeneity and incomplete information about income levels. Our analysis compares experimentally the performance of a lottery, an all-pay auction and a benchmark voluntary contribution mechanism. We find that prize-based mechanisms perform better than voluntary contribution in terms of public good provision. Contrary to the theoretical predictions, contributions are significantly higher in the lottery than in the all-pay auction, both overall and by individual income types
Benchmark (surveying · Economics · Focus (optics · Free riding · Incentive · Lottery · Mechanism (biology · Microeconomics · Private information retrieval · Public economics · Public good · Auction Theory and Applications · Computer Science · Economic Policies and Impacts · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Public Goods
Why free ride?
Communication and Free‐riding Behavior
Z-Tree
Do too many cooks always spoil the stew? An experimental analysis of rent-seeking and the role of a strategic buyer
Rent dissipation when rent seekers are budget constrained
How (Not) to Raise Money
| Citations per year | 0.18 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2024 (10) |
| Highly cited | No |