Smarter Task Assignment or Greater Effort
The Impact of Incentives on Team Performance
Bibliographic Data
We use an experiment to study the impact of team-based incentives, exploiting rich data from personnel records and management information systems. Using a triple difference design, we show that the incentive scheme had an impact on team performance, even with quite large teams. We examine whether this effect was due to increased effort from workers or strategic task reallocation. We find that the provision of financial incentives did raise individual performance but that managers also disproportionately reallocated efficient workers to the incentivised tasks. We show that this reallocation was the more important contributor to the overall outcome. Copyright © The Author(s). Journal compilation © Royal Economic Society 2009
Economics · Incentive · Media studies · Political science · Schools of economic thought · Sociology · Auction Theory and Applications · Classics · Economic Policies and Impacts · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · History
The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market
Team incentives, task assignment, and performance
Economic Adjustment during the Great Recession
Managing Street-Level Arbitrariness
The role of motivation and volition in economic decisions
Better together? Group incentives and the demand for prevention
Top-Down Accountability, Social Unrest, and Anticorruption in China
Bonus incentives and team effort levels
Management and Shocks to Worker Productivity
Bureaucrat Allocation in the Public Sector
Incentives in the Public Sector
The longer-run performance effects of agencification
Incentives and Organizations in the Public Sector
The Wage Policy of a Firm
Moral Hazard in Teams
The Provision of Incentives in Firms
The Internal Economics of the Firm
Inference with Difference-in-Differences and Other Panel Data
Peer Pressure and Partnerships
Compensation and Productive Efficiency in Partnerships
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,09 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2024 (10) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |