Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bundling Genetic and Financial Technologies for More Resilient and Productive Small-Scale Farmers in Africa

Bibliographic Data

ID9718132
AuthorsStephen R Boucher (0009-0006-4796-567X, University of California, Davis), M Carter (0000-0003-0960-9181, University of California, Davis, corresponding author), Michael R Carter (University of California, Davis, USA, NBER, USA & University of Cape Town), Jon Einar Flatnes (0000-0002-8609-3644, Chr. Michelsen Institute), Travis J Lybbert (0000-0002-4905-4881, University of California, Davis), Jonathan G Malacarne (University of Maine), Jonathan Malacarne (0000-0002-3802-8637, University of Maine), Paswel P Marenya (0000-0003-2496-2303, International Centre for the Improvement of Maize & Wheat (CIMMYT)), Paswel P Mareyna (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), Laura A Paul (0000-0002-4889-3464, Economic Research Service)
Year2024
Volume134
Issue662
Pages2321-2350
Publication date2024-08-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Economic Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0133 • E-ISSN: 1468-0297
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ej/ueae012
OpenAlexW4391773544
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited32

Using a multi-year, spatially diversified randomised controlled trial spanning two African countries, this paper explores whether a complementary bundle of genetic and financial technologies can boost the resilience and productivity of small-scale farmers. The analysis shows that both moderate droughts and more severe yield losses undermine the resilience of control-group households, and that these shocks have long-lasting effects as farmers invest and produce less following shocks. Severe yield shocks also increase hunger and food insecurity. The genetic technology—drought-tolerant seeds—provides economically significant protection against mid-season drought and mitigates the long-term drop in farm productivity seen in the control group. The financial technology—satellite-based index insurance—offsets the long-term consequences of severe yield losses that are not mitigated by the drought-tolerant seeds. Finally, the analysis shows that treatment-group farmers who experienced shocks and saw the technologies in action subsequently increased their agricultural investment beyond pre-shock levels, an effect we call the resilience dividend. Unfortunately, this apparent experiential learning cuts both ways. Farmers who did not experience the efficacy of the risk management technologies backed away from using them. Our findings thus showcase how genetic and financial risk-mitigating technologies can offer farmers more complete protection, as well as the challenge of inducing sustained uptake of technologies that are midway between experience and credence goods and only infrequently reveal their benefits

Business · Cartography · Economics · Geography · Scale (ratio · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Economic Growth and Development · Finance · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development

  • Locus of control, climate change adaptation and perception

    Open Access•Halefom Yigzaw Nigus, Martin Paul Jr Tabe Ojong et al.•World Development•2026

  • Climate-resilient crop varieties, productivity and household welfare

    Open Access•A Y Kamara, Oyakhilomen Oyinbo et al.•Environment Development and…•2025

  • Do index insurance programs live up to their promises? Aggregating evidence from multiple experiments

    Open Access•Pauline Castaing, Jules Gazeaud•Journal of Development Economics•2025

  • Agricultural innovation frames, policies, and instruments

    Open Access•Catherine Ragasa, David J Spielman et al.•Food Policy•2025

  • Drought tolerant maize for farmer adaptation to drought in sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Monica Fisher, Tufa Abate et al.•Climatic Change•2015

  • Can Higher Prices Stimulate Product Use? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Zambia

    Nava Ashraf, James Berry et al.•American Economic Review•2010

  • Agricultural Decisions after Relaxing Credit and Risk Constraints

    Dean Karlan, Robert Osei et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2014

  • Technological Innovations, Downside Risk, and the Modernization of Agriculture

    Kyle Emerick, Alain De Janvry et al.•American Economic Review•2016

  • Informal Risk Sharing, Index Insurance, and Risk Taking in Developing Countries

    Ahmed Mushfiq Mobarak, Mark R Rosenzweig•American Economic Review•2013

  • Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer

    Esther Duflo, Michael Kremer et al.•American Economic Review•2011

  • The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—a new environmental record for monitoring extremes

    Open Access•Chris Funk, Pete Peterson et al.•Scientific Data•2015

  • Toward a theory of resilience for international development applications

    Open Access•Christopher B Barrett, Mark A Constas•Proceedings of the National…•2014

  • Learning from Lemons

    Open Access•Daniel Clarke, Daniel J Clarke et al.•SSRN Electronic Journal•2013

  • Do the benefits of improved management practices to nutritional outcomes “dry up” in the presence of drought? Evidence from East Africa

    Open Access•Jonathan Malacarne, Laura A Paul•Food Policy•2022

  • Caveat utilitor

    Open Access•Joanna Upton, Susana Constenla-Villoslada et al.•Journal of Development Economics•2022

  • Ex ante and ex post effects of hybrid index insurance in Bangladesh

    Open Access•Ruth Vargas Hill, Neha Kumar et al.•Journal of Development Economics•2018

  • Cash transfers and index insurance

    Open Access•Nele Jensen, Nathaniel D Jensen et al.•Journal of Development Economics•2017

  • Impacts of drought-tolerant maize varieties on productivity, risk, and resource use

    Open Access•Franklin Simtowe, Emily Amondo et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • Information and Consumer Behavior

    Phillip Nelson•Journal of Political Economy•1970

  • Demand for Complementary Financial and Technological Tools for Managing Drought Risk

    Patrick S Ward, David L Ortega et al.•Economic Development and Cultural…•2020

Unique citing works4
Citations per year4
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae