Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Differences in Growth Rates and Kaldor's Laws

Bibliographic Data

ID9723838
AuthorsA Parikh (corresponding author)
Year1978
Volume45
Issue177
Pages83
Publication date1978-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEconomica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0427 • E-ISSN: 1468-0335
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2553256
OpenAlexW2007373113
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited3

where p is the rate of growth of productivity, q is the rate of growth of output, e is the rate of growth of employment, and a, (3, -y and 8 are parameters. Kaldor regressed e on q to support his conclusion that the slow growth of industrial productivity was due to a shortage of labour which prevented exploitation of economies of scale. He took the growth rate q of manufacturing output as an independent variable and regressed the growth rate of productivity p and of employment e on q, concluding that each percentage addition to the growth of output requires a 0.5 per cent increase in the growth rate of employment, in terms of man-hours, and is associated with a 0.5 per cent increase in the growth of productivity. The argument depends on a positive relationship between productivity and employment, and Rowthorn (1975a) examined this by regressing p directly on e rather than indirectly by regressing p or e on q as shown in (1) and (2). He concluded that the positive association depended entirely on the presence of one extreme observation, and that if Japan were excluded from the sample the association between p and e disappeared. The main purpose of this paper is to argue that both sets of results are subject to simultaneous equations bias and that mis-specification of estimated equations leads to incorrect estimates and wrong conclusions

Argument (complex analysis) · Econometrics · Economic shortage · Economics · Geometry · Growth rate · Labour economics · Macroeconomics · Mathematical analysis · Productivity · Variable (mathematics) · Economic theories and models · Economic Theory and Policy · Internal Medicine · Mathematics · Medicine · Philosophy

  • Progrès technique, croissance et emploi

    Ruth Boyer, Robert Boyer et al.•Revue économique•1981

  • Productivity, Factor Transfers and Economic Growth in the UK

    M Chatterji, M R Wickens•Economica•1982

  • What Still Remains of Kaldor's Laws

    John Mccombie, J S L McCombie•The Economic Journal•1981

  • Manufacturing Productivity and Snowbelt-Sunbelt Shifts

    Emilio Casetti•Economic Geography•1984

  • Testing spatial interactions in Kaldor's growth laws

    Open Access•Arfat Ahmad Sofi, Mohammad Younus Bhat et al.•Journal of Public Affairs•2020

  • The spatial dynamics of japanese manufacturing productivity

    Open Access•Emilio Casetti, Kyoko Tanaka•Papers of the Regional Science…•1992

  • Kaldor's Laws and Spatial Dependence

    Jordi Pons‐Novell, Jordi Pons-Novell et al.•Regional Studies•1999

  • A Reply to Lord Kaldor's Comment

    Robert Rowthorn, R E Rowthorn•The Economic Journal•1975

  • What Remains of Kaldor's Law

    Robert Rowthorn, R E Rowthorn•The Economic Journal•1975

  • Diffusion, Convergence and Kaldor's Laws

    John Cornwall•The Economic Journal•1976

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,16
Citation span1981 - 2020 (40)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae