What Good are Statistics that Don’t Generalize
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9730627 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Williamson Shaffer (0000-0001-9613-5740, University of Wisconsin–Madison, corresponding author), Ronald C Serlin (0000-0003-4686-8465, University of Wisconsin–Madison) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 14-25 |
| Publication date | 2004-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Educational Researcher (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-189X • E-ISSN: 1935-102X |
| Publisher | American Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3102/0013189x033009014 |
| OpenAlex | W2159449838 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 18 |
Quantitative and qualitative inquiry are sometimes portrayed as distinct and incompatible paradigms for research in education. Approaches to combining qualitative and quantitative research typically “integrate” the two methods by letting them co-exist independently within a single research study. Here we describe intra-sample statistical analysis (ISSA) as a general technique for using quantitative tools to support qualitative inquiry so as to simultaneously provide warrants from qualitative and quantitative traditions. In certain circumstances ISSA makes it possible to relax the requirement that individual participants be treated as the unit of analysis in statistical models, and thus provides justification for coding qualitative observations and drawing statistically based conclusions about observations in a qualitative context. We developed ISSA and describe it here both because it can be used as a tool for qualitative research, and because it illuminates the relationship between method and interpretation in the research traditions that it bridges. In this article, we (a) summarize key features of qualitative and quantitative research relevant to ISSA; (b) describe ISSA as an analytical technique; (c) discuss the quantitative and qualitative justification for ISSA and the nature of the conclusions that can be drawn based on it; and (d) explore the more general implications of ISSA for qualitative and quantitative inquiry
Coding (social sciences · Context (archaeology · Data science · Educational research · Epistemology · Geography · Interpretation (philosophy · Management science · Qualitative analysis · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Quantitative analysis (chemistry · Quantitative Research · Sample (material · Social science · Sociology · Statistics · Computer Science · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Engineering · Mathematics · Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques · Statistics Education and Methodologies
Linking undergraduates' future orientation and their employability confidence
Étude d’un enseignement de la lecture au cours préparatoire
The Realist Survey
Developing a Syllabus for a Mixed‐Methods Research Course
Sampling Designs in Qualitative Research
Using Google Scholar to Estimate the Impact of Journal Articles in Education
What Good Is Polarizing Research Into Qualitative and Quantitative
Reconsidering the Compatibility Thesis and Eclecticism
Uncovering Relationships between Task Understanding and Monitoring Proficiencies in Postsecondary Learners
Pesquisar e formar
Use of Web-Based Portfolios as Tools for Reflection in Preservice Teacher Education
Basics of qualitative research
Mixed methodology
Handbook of qualitative research
Learning From Strangers
Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis
Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data
On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9
Research design
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
The Interpretation of Cultures
Ways of Worldmaking
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,55 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2024 (19) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |