How Did Colleges Disburse Emergency Aid During Covid-19? An Implementation Analysis of the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9730805 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Elizabeth Bell (0000-0003-1021-9287, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, autor de correspondencia), David J Schwegman (0000-0001-8254-7111, American University), David Schwegman (Assistant Professor, American University, Washington, DC), Michael Hand (0000-0002-1643-8213, U.S. General Services Administration, Office of Evaluation Sciences, Washington, DC), Michael S Hand (General Services Administration), Michael DiDomenico (U.S. General Services Administration, Office of Evaluation Sciences, Washington, DC) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 52 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 259-271 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Educational Researcher (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0013-189X • E-ISSN: 1935-102X |
| Editorial | American Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3102/0013189x231161318 |
| PMID | 38602928 |
| OpenAlex | W4327950904 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 24 |
To address the unprecedented challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress authorized the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF I) in March 2020 with over $6 billion allocated for emergency financial aid. In this paper, we utilize the administrative burden framework to analyze HEERF I implementation for a stratified random sample of colleges, focusing on the implications for equity. We find that disbursement policies varied along two dimensions: (1) whether they imposed burdens on students by requiring applications and proof of hardship and (2) whether they targeted needy students and varied the amount of aid according to need. When we examine sectoral differences, we find that private for-profit colleges were more likely to place higher burden on students, whereas public and minority-serving institutions were more likely to reduce burden
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Actuarial science · Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Disbursement · Economic growth · Economics · Emergency management · Equity (law · Higher education · Pandemic · Political science · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 · COVID-19 and healthcare impacts · Disaster Management and Resilience · Emergency and Acute Care Studies · Finance · Medicine
Promoting Academic Success Through University Microgrants for Students
Program Design to Ease Administrative Burden in Times of Crisis
A Sentiment Analysis Study on Gender and Racial Inequities in College Students’ Perceptions of the Covid-19 Pandemic
Do Vulnerable Citizens (Really) Perceive Higher Bureaucracy Costs? Testing a Key Claim of the Administrative Burden Framework
Who Deserves Scarce Health and Education Resources? How Policy Context Shapes Target Group Deservingness
Leveraging insights from behavioral science and administrative burden in free college program design
Paying the Price
Psychological Frictions and the Incomplete Take-Up of Social Benefits
The impact of Covid-19 on student experiences and expectations
Implementation Research
Social Equity Is a Pillar of Public Administration
Working Within a System of Administrative Burden
The Politics of Designing Tuition-Free College
Just or Unjust? How Ideological Beliefs Shape Street‐Level Bureaucrats’ Perceptions of Administrative Burden
Human Capital and Administrative Burden
Reducing Compliance Demands in Government Benefit Programs Improves the Psychological Well-Being of Target Group Members
The Bite of Administrative Burden
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |