Charting the Impact of Federal Spending for Education Research
A Bibliometric Approach
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9732175 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Carolina Milesi (NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, autor correspondente), Kevin L Brown (0000-0002-5977-7370, NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL), Louise C Hawkley (0000-0001-7876-8560, University of Chicago), Louise Hawkley (NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL), Eric Dropkin (NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL), B Schneider (0000-0002-3233-166X, Michigan State University), Barbara L Schneider (Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI) |
| Ano | 2014 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Fascículo | 7 |
| Páginas | 361-370 |
| Data de publicação | 2014-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Educational Researcher (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0013-189X • E-ISSN: 1935-102X |
| Editora | American Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3102/0013189x14554002 |
| OpenAlex | W2170165709 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 22 |
Impact evaluation plays a critical role in determining whether federally funded research programs in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics are wise investments. This paper develops quantitative methods for program evaluation and applies this approach to a flagship National Science Foundation–funded education research program, Research and Evaluation on Education in Science and Engineering (REESE). Results of three different bibliometric analyses all point to the same conclusion: REESE is an interdisciplinary research program that attracts highly productive investigators who exhibit an additional increase in their productivity rate as a result of receiving REESE funding. Limitations of the bibliometric approach are discussed, and directions are provided for the future of impact evaluations of research programs intended to serve the public good
Economic growth · Economics · Educational research · Foundation (evidence · Management science · Mathematics education · Point (geometry · Political science · Productivity · Program evaluation · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Mathematics · Psychology · Public Administration · Research Data Management Practices · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Academic careers, patents, and productivity
Scholarly communication and bibliometrics
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Comparing Research Productivity Across Disciplines and Career Stages
The Evaluation of Large Research Initiatives
Using Citation Analysis to Assess Scholarly Productivity
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,38 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2018 - 2020 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |