Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Common Structural Design Features of Rubrics May Represent a Threat to Validity

Bibliographic Data

ID9732191
AuthorsStephen Mark Humphry (The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA), Stephen Humphry (The University of Western Australia, corresponding author), Sandra Allison Heldsinger (The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA), Sandra Heldsinger (The University of Western Australia)
Year2014
Volume43
Issue5
Pages253-263
Publication date2014-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducational Researcher (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-189X • E-ISSN: 1935-102X
PublisherAmerican Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3102/0013189x14542154
OpenAlexW2081387623
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited26

Rubrics for assessing student performance are often seen as providing rich information about complex skills. Despite their widespread usage, however, little empirical research has focused on whether it is possible for rubrics to validly meet their intended purposes. The authors examine a rubric used to assess students’ writing in a large-scale testing program. They present empirical evidence for the existence of a potentially widespread threat to the validity of rubric assessments that arose due to design features. In this research, an iterative tryout-redesign-tryout approach was adopted. The research casts doubt on whether rubrics with structurally aligned categories can validly assess complex skills. A solution is proposed that involves rethinking the structural design of the rubric to mitigate the threat to validity. Broader implications are discussed

Empirical research · Mathematics education · Rubric · Statistics · Computer Science · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Mathematics · Psychology · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Student Assessment and Feedback

  • Pedagogical mediation with ICT for the development of critical thinking in primary education

    Open Access•León-Díaz Fredy, Oscar Rafael Boude Figueredo et al.•Thinking Skills and Creativity•2026

  • Agnosticism in instructional observation systems

    Open Access•Sean Kelly•Education Policy Analysis Archives•2023

  • Using global observation protocols to inform research on teaching effectiveness and school improvement

    Open Access•Sean Kelly, Robert Bringe et al.•Education Policy Analysis Archives•2020

  • Challenges and opportunities for classroom-based formative assessment and AI

    Open Access•Therese N Hopfenbeck, Zhonghua Zhang et al.•Frontiers in Education•2023

  • A Two-Stage Method for Obtaining Reliable Teacher Assessments of Writing

    Open Access•Stephen Humphry, Sandy Heldsinger•Frontiers in Education•2020

  • Judging similarity versus judging difference

    Open Access•Stephen Humphry, Paul Montuoro•Frontiers in Education•2023

  • Formative Assessment of Social-Emotional Skills Using Rubrics

    Open Access•Gina Pancorbo, Ricardo Primi et al.•Frontiers in Education•2021

  • Relationship between Students’ Perception of a Rubric for Oral Presentations and Their Academic Characteristics

    Open Access•Víctor Raul Ferrer-Pardo, Irene Jimenez-Perez et al.•Education Sciences•2022

  • Mark scheme design for school- and college-based assessment in VTQs

    Joanna Williamson, Simon F J Child•Journal of Vocational Education…•2022

  • How dominant language influences rubric reading and task performance

    Open Access•Ernesto Panadero, Pablo Delgado et al.•European Journal of Psychology of…•2025

  • What’s in a score? Problematizing interpretations of observation scores

    Open Access•Mark White, Kirsti Klette•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2023

  • Development and psychometric properties of rubrics for assessing social-emotional skills in youth

    Open Access•Gina Pancorbo, Ricardo Primi et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2020

  • Effects of rubric quality on marker variation in higher education

    Open Access•Subrata Chakraborty, Christopher Dann et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2021

  • Rubricizing the assessment practice

    Open Access•Chao Han, Mengting Jiang et al.•Language Testing•2026

  • Same grade for different reasons, different grades for the same reason

    Open Access•Ilona Rinne•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2024

  • Analysis of online rubric platforms

    Open Access•Ernesto Panadero, Alazne Fernández Ortube et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2025

  • Improving assessment of procedural skills in health sciences education

    Open Access•Rafael García-Ros, María-Arántzazu Ruescas-Nicolau et al.•BMC Psychology•2024

  • The use of scoring rubrics

    Open Access•Anders Jönsson, Gunilla Svingby•Educational Research Review•2007

  • The Concept of Validity.

    Denny Borsboom, Gideon J Mellenbergh et al.•Psychological Review•2004

  • A Rasch Model for Partial Credit Scoring

    Open Access•Geoff N Masters•Psychometrika•1982

  • A constant error in psychological ratings.

    Edward L Thorndike•Journal of Applied Psychology•1920

  • A framework relating outcomes based education and the taxonomy of educational objectives

    Open Access•David Andrich•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2002

  • A review of rubric use in higher education

    Y Malini Reddy, Heidi Andrade•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2010

  • Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading

    D Royce Sadler•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2009

  • A rating formulation for ordered response categories

    Open Access•David Andrich•Psychometrika•1978

  • The Interplay of Evidence and Consequences in the Validation of Performance Assessments

    Samuel Messick•Educational Researcher•1994

  • What Good Is Polarizing Research Into Qualitative and Quantitative

    Open Access•Kadriye Ercikan, Wolff-Michael Roth•Educational Researcher•2006

  • Assessment of Complex Performances

    Open Access•Ginette Delandshere, Anthony R Petrosky•Educational Researcher•1998

  • Meaning and Values in Test Validation

    Samuel Messick•Educational Researcher•1989

Unique citing works17
Citations per year2,83
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 17

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae