Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

For What and for Whom? Expanding the Role of Research Syntheses for Diverse Stakeholders

Bibliographic Data

ID9734248
AuthorsRita Elaine Silver (0000-0002-5033-6720, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, corresponding author), Vinay Kumar (0000-0001-9785-3218, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore), Deborah Chua Fengyi (0000-0003-0863-3104, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore), Michael Tan (0000-0003-1841-6226, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore), Johannis Auri Bin Abdul Aziz (0000-0002-4955-9396, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore)
Year2024
Volume53
Issue8
Pages464-471
Publication date2024-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducational Researcher (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-189X • E-ISSN: 1935-102X
PublisherAmerican Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3102/0013189x241285414
OpenAlexW4402993364
LanguageEN
References cited49

Systematic reviews have witnessed significant growth across many fields, including education. In this article, we outline the background of this growth, highlight the tendency to focus on methodological considerations, and propose a framework to support education researchers in preparing systematic reviews with broad impact. We draw on our experience working with education stakeholders in Singapore and on international scholarship to propose a framework that supports education researchers in clarifying and specifying their aims and audiences and crafting syntheses of appropriate types. Our aim is that this framework, which includes examples illustrating four categories of reviews, acts as a reflective tool which researchers can use to maximize the utility, value, and potential impact of education research

Educational research · Mathematics education · Sociology · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · Psychology

  • Escape education

    Open Access•Alice Veldkamp, Liesbeth van de Grint et al.•Educational Research Review•2020

  • Unveiling Professional Development

    Open Access•Gloria Dall’alba, J Sandberg•Review of Educational Research•2006

  • Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts

    Open Access•Shurui Bai, Khe Foon Hew et al.•Educational Research Review•2020

  • Study Quality in Quantitative L2 Research (1990–2010)

    Open Access•Luke Plonsky•Modern Language Journal•2014

  • Teacher education around the world

    Linda Darling-Hammond•European Journal of Teacher…•2017

  • Systematic Reviews in Educational Research

    Open Access•Mark Newman, David Gough•Systematic Reviews in Educational…•2020

  • The Relevance of Systematic Reviews to Educational Policy and Practice

    Philip Davies•Oxford Review of Education•2000

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  • Unapologetically Black Creative Educational Experiences in Higher Education

    Open Access•Lori D Patton, Toby S Jenkins et al.•Review of Research in Education•2022

  • Place Matters

    Open Access•Alisha Butler, Kristin Sinclair et al.•Review of Research in Education•2020

  • Mining Big Data in Education

    Open Access•Christian Fischer, Zachary A Pardos et al.•Review of Research in Education•2020

  • A Critical Review of Assessments of Creativity in Education

    Open Access•Haiying Long, Barbara A Kerr et al.•Review of Research in Education•2022

  • Simulation-Based Learning in Higher Education

    Open Access•Olga Chernikova, Nicole Heitzmann et al.•Review of Educational Research•2020

  • A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relations Between Motivation and Reading Achievement for K–12 Students

    Open Access•Jessica R Toste, Lisa Didion et al.•Review of Educational Research•2020

  • A typology of secondary research in Applied Linguistics

    Open Access•Sin Wang Chong, Luke Plonsky•Applied Linguistics Review•2024

  • Opening the methodological black box of research synthesis in language education

    Open Access•Sin Wang Chong, Michael Bond et al.•Applied Linguistics Review•2024

  • Why “What Works” Won’t Work

    Open Access•Gert Biesta•Educational Theory•2007

  • For Public Sociology

    Open Access•M Burawoy•American Sociological Review•2005

  • The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

    Thomas S Kuhn, Thomas Kühn et al.•La Structure des révolutions…•1996

  • Social–Emotional Interventions with Children and Youth Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

    Open Access•John L Luckner, Sara Movahedazarhouligh•The Journal of Deaf Studies and…•2019

  • How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective

    Open Access•Mary Dixon-Woods, Sheila Bonas et al.•Qualitative Research•2006

  • Understanding the Impacts of Research Synthesis

    Open Access•Carina Wyborn, Elena Louder et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2018

  • Generalizing Across Borders

    Open Access•Allan Luke•Educational Researcher•2011

  • The Power of Feedback

    Open Access•John Hattie, Helen Timperley•Review of Educational Research•2007

  • From Synthesis to Script

    Open Access•Margarete Sandelowski, Frank Trimble et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2006

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae