Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Teachers Choosing Rich Tasks

The Moderating Impact of Technology on Student Learning, Enjoyment, and Preparation

Bibliographic Data

ID9734385
AuthorsPeter Aubusson (0000-0002-6319-0695, University of Technology Sydney, corresponding author), Paul Burke (0009-0005-5775-9573, Business School, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia), Paul F Burke (0000-0003-0978-0237, University of Technology Sydney), Sandy Schuck (0000-0001-7482-0480, University of Technology Sydney), Matthew Kearney (0000-0001-5565-6312, University of Technology Sydney), Bart Frischknecht (University of Technology Sydney), Bart D Frischknecht (0000-0003-3365-2315, University of Technology Sydney)
Year2014
Volume43
Issue5
Pages219-229
Publication date2014-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducational Researcher (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-189X • E-ISSN: 1935-102X
PublisherAmerican Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3102/0013189x14537115
OpenAlexW2144411151
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited31

This article reports on the pioneering use in education of Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs) to assess teachers’ decisions regarding deployment of rich tasks. The incorporation of this quantitative method into what is usually considered the domain of qualitative researchers is an innovative feature of this study. The DCEs enabled rigorous, reliable, and efficient investigation of the relationships between attributes of the complex environment in which teachers operate. The findings articulate the choices made by teachers related to rich task pedagogy, technology use, and other resources. Understanding the influences on these choices will inform the adoption and adaptation of productive technologies, improve dissemination of good practices, and enhance the design of digital technologies, resulting in better student learning outcomes

Adaptation (eye · Domain (mathematical analysis · Educational technology · Knowledge management · Mathematics education · Software deployment · Task (project management · Technology integration · Computer Science · Education and Technology Integration · Engineering · Gender and Technology in Education · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology

  • The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers' technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge

    Open Access•Rebeca Scherer, Ronny Scherer et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2018

  • Mediating learning with mobile devices through pedagogical innovation

    Open Access•Paul F Burke, Sandy Schuck et al.•Computers & Education•2025

  • Policy Framing, Social Networks, and Teacher Perspectives in a Technology Rollout

    Open Access•Ayesha K Hashim, Caitlin E Kearney•Educational Administration…•2025

  • What attracts teachers to rural and remote schools? Incentivising teachers’ employment choices in New South Wales

    Open Access•Paul F Burke, John Buchanan•Australian Journal of Education•2022

  • Integrating Rich Mathematical Tasks in Secondary Classrooms

    Open Access•Kelly Mckie, Rebecca Carter et al.•Canadian Journal of Science…•2025

  • The iPAC Scale

    Open Access•Matthew Kearney, Paul F Burke et al.•TechTrends•2019

  • It’s More Than Just Technology Adoption

    Open Access•Heather Leary, Victor R Lee et al.•TechTrends•2021

  • Integrating Student Response Technology into a Large Undergraduate Course

    Open Access•Scott Matteson, Michael M Grant•TechTrends•2024

  • Internet Use Habits and Risk Behaviours in Preadolescence

    Open Access•Javier Fernández‐Montalvo, Javier Fernández-Montalvo et al.•Comunicar•2014

  • University teaching with digital technologies

    Open Access•Carlos Marcelo, Carmen Yot et al.•Comunicar•2015

  • Apprenticeship in Thinking

    B Rogoff•Apprenticeship in thinking•1990

  • A law of comparative judgment.

    L L Thurstone•Psychological Review•1927

  • Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices

    Open Access•Peggy A Ertmer, Anne Ottenbreit-Leftwich et al.•Computers & Education•2012

  • Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments

    Open Access•Jordan J Louviere, George Woodworth•Journal of Marketing Research•1983

  • Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education

    Open Access•William Damon, Erin Phelps•International Journal of…•1989

  • Incentive and informational properties of preference questions

    Open Access•Richard T Carson, Theodore Groves•Environmental and Resource…•2007

  • Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions

    Open Access•Vivek Venkatesh, Viswanath Venkatesh et al.•Decision Sciences•2008

  • Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Fred D Davis•MIS Quarterly•1989

  • Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration

    Open Access•Julie Mueller, Eileen Wood et al.•Computers & Education•2008

  • Authentic Pedagogy and Student Performance

    Fred M Newmann, Helen M Marks et al.•American Journal of Education•1996

  • Beyond Common Sense in Educational Restructuring

    Open Access•Fred M Newmann•Educational Researcher•1993

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0,83
Citation span2014 - 2025 (12)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae