Only Connect’
Learned Societies in Nineteenth-Century Britain, by William C. Lubenow
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9742142 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William Foote Whyte (0000-0001-6955-1554, St. John's College, corresponding author), William Whyte (0000-0002-6067-1952, St John’s College 1 , Oxford) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 132 |
| Issue | 555 |
| Pages | 424-426 |
| Publication date | 2017-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The English Historical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ehr/cex022 |
| OpenAlex | W2590137143 |
| Language | EN |
William C. Lubenow certainly knows his thinkers. Originally a historian of nineteenth-century government, he turned his attention to England’s intellectuals more than twenty years ago—and has never looked back. A series of well-received studies has been the result, including two books: The Cambridge Apostles, 1820–1914: Liberalism, Imagination, and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life (1998; rev. ante, cxiv [1999], 1,354–5) and Liberal Intellectuals and Public Culture in Modern Britain, 1815–1914: Making Words Flesh (2010; rev. ante, cxxvii [2012], 466–8). This new volume can be seen as a companion piece to both. It develops themes about liberalism and friendship first articulated in his work on the Apostles, and substantially augments a chapter on ‘Clubs, societies, and new forms of binding friendship’ found in the second book. Its methodology is similar, too: drawing on a remarkable range of readings, from private papers and public pronouncements, to assemble, piece by piece, a picture of a whole milieu
Apostles · Art · Economic history · Friendship · Liberalism · Literature · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Classics · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · History · History of Science and Medicine · Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |