Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Litigation as a Form of Pressure Group Activity

Bibliographic Data

ID9769039
AuthorsClement E Vose (Wesleyan University, corresponding author)
Year1958
Volume319
Issue1
Pages20-31
Publication date1958-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7162 • E-ISSN: 1552-3349
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/000271625831900104
OpenAlexW2162307484
LanguageEN
Citations received31

The important place of judicial review in the American system of government and the attention demanded by litigation dealing with large issues of public law have drawn organizations into many important court cases. In Supreme Court cases, organizations have participated openly by filing briefs as "friend of the court." They have also played a less noticed role either by aiding individuals in whose name "test cases" have been brought or by providing assistance to govern ment attorneys defending a statute in which the organization has an interest. Particular attention is drawn to the activities of the American Liberty League, the National Consumers' League, and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. The practices of these and other organiza tions have led to controls designed to assure the integrity of the judicial process. It is contended that controls must be applied with caution lest there be interference with freedom of associa tion and with the concomitant rights of access to the courts

Government (linguistics · Judicial review · League · Political science · Statute · Supreme court · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Regulation and Compliance Studies

  • Some New Concerns of Legal Process Research Within Political Science

    Open Access•Stuart S Nagel•Law & Society Review•1971

  • Adaptive Jurisprudence

    Open Access•John Johnson, John W Johnson•Historian•1977

  • Pour une sociologie des pratiques de defense

    Hélène Michel•Sociétés contemporaines•2003

  • Interest Group Success in the Courts

    Donald R Songer, Reginald S Sheehan•Political Research Quarterly•1993

  • Friends and Interveners

    Open Access•Perry Mcd Collins, Lauren A Mccarthy•Journal of Law and Courts•2017

  • Searching for avenues of influence

    Open Access•Adam J Newmark, Anthony J Nownes•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2023

  • The Social Movement Turn in Law

    Open Access•Scott L Cummings•Law & Social Inquiry•2017

  • Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation

    Open Access•Karen O’connor, Karen O'Connor et al.•Law & Society Review•1982

  • The role of sanction in conflict resolution

    Open Access•Harold D Lasswell, Richard Arens•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1967

  • The Anti‐Inflation case

    Open Access•Peter H Russell•Canadian Public Administration•1977

  • The Supreme Court and “The Moment of Truth”

    Open Access•Carl Brent Swisher•American Political Science Review•1960

  • Constitutional Law in 1958–1959

    Open Access•David Fellman•American Political Science Review•1960

  • On Behalf of the Condemned? The Impact of the Naacp Legal Defense Fund on Capital Punishment Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Sarah Tauber, Steven C Tauber•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Lobbyists before the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Perry Mcd Collins, Paul M Collins•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Making Way

    Open Access•Jeb Barnes, Thomas F Burke•Law & Society Review•2012

  • The Party Variable in Judges' Voting

    Open Access•David W Adamany•American Political Science Review•1969

  • Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court

    Gregory A Caldeira, John Wright et al.•The Journal of Politics•1990

  • Process choice

    Open Access•Cary Coglianese•Regulation & Governance•2011

  • The Recent Politics of the United States Supreme Court

    Open Access•Richard Hodder-Williams, Richard Hodder‐william•Politics•1985

  • Informational Need, Institutional Capacity, and Court Receptivity

    Open Access•Jenna Becker Kane•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Why the Haves Don't Always Come Out Ahead

    Open Access•Donald R Songer, Donald Songer et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2000

  • Law, Policymaking, and the Policy Process

    Open Access•Stephen Barclay, Scott Barclay et al.•Policy Studies Journal•1998

  • Judicial Power in Domestic and International Politics

    Open Access•Jeffrey K Staton, Will H Moore•International Organization•2011

  • From Conflict Theory to Conflict Methodology

    Open Access•Timothy Lehmann, Timothy C Lehmann et al.•Sociological Inquiry•1974

  • Lawyers and Embedded Legal Activity in the Southern Civil Rights Movement

    Open Access•Kenneth T Andrews, Kay Jowers•Law & Policy•2018

  • Litigating Scientific Creationism, or “Scopes” II, III

    Open Access•Wayne V Mcintosh•Law & Policy•1985

  • Does Chevron Matter

    Open Access•Mark J Richards, Joseph L Smith et al.•Law & Policy•2006

  • Friends as Foes

    Open Access•Gregg Ivers, Karen O''Connor et al.•Law & Policy•1987

  • Participação Social no STF

    Open Access•Lívia Gil Guimarães•Revista Direito e Práxis•2020

  • How Do Cause Lawyers Decide When and Where to Litigate on behalf of Their Cause

    Open Access•Stephen Barclay, Scott Barclay et al.•Law & Society Review•2014

  • Debunking the Myth of Interest Group Invincibility in the Courts

    Open Access•Lee Epstein, C K Rowland•American Political Science Review•1991

Unique citing works31
Citations per year0,47
Citation span1960 - 2023 (64)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 31

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae