Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Two years later

Effect of question repetition and retention interval on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults

Bibliographic Data

ID9786350
AuthorsDebra Ann Poole (0000-0001-6355-3305, Central Michigan University, corresponding author), Lawrence T White (Beloit College)
Year1993
Volume29
Issue5
Pages844-853
Publication date1993-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDevelopmental Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-1649 • E-ISSN: 1939-0599
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/0012-1649.29.5.844
OpenAlexW2005007198
LanguageEN
Citations received34
References cited8

This study examined witnesses' memories for an event experienced 2 years earlier. Ss in 4 age groups (6-, 8- and 10-year-olds and adults; N= 79) answered repeated questions about an ambiguous incident that occurred as part of an earlier study (D. A. Poole & L. T. White, 1991). Surprisingly, the effects of question repetition were similar to the patterns observed 2 years ago. There were important differences in the testimonies of children and adults, however, that were not observed in the initial study: Children were less consistent than adults across sessions on yes-no questions, less accurate in response to open-ended questions, and more likely to fabricate answers to a question about a man's occupation. Some children also confused the actions of 2 research assistants. These results indicate the need for additional research on qualitative and quantitative changes in children's testimonies over long delays. The literature on children's eyewitness testimony is a story of contradictions, with developmental trends in accuracy, suggestibility, and response to stress differing from study to study (see Ceci & Bruck, 1993, for a review). Discrepancies have prompted critics to argue that eyewitness research lacks theoretical cohesion and that established theories of perception and memory are not immediately applicable because of the influence of motivational and social factors in event reporting (Sheehy & Chapman, 1982, p. 345). In early studies, concerns about ecological validity often loomed larger than efforts to reconcile eyewitness findings with traditional concepts of memory development

Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Eyewitness testimony · Interval (graph theory · Repetition (rhetorical device · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Identity, Memory, and Therapy · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Memory Processes and Influences · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Do we need to rethink guidance on repeated interviews

    David La Rooy, Carmit Katz et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2010

  • Evaluation of a comprehensive interactive training system for investigative interviewers of children

    Mairi S Benson, Mairi Benson et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2015

  • Suggestibility of the child witness

    Stephen J Ceci, Maggie Bruck•Psychological Bulletin•1993

  • Child Sexual Abuse Evaluations

    Open Access•Kathryn Kuehnle, Mary Connell•Handbook of Psychology, Second…•2012

  • The Science of False Memory

    C J RAINERD, Charles J Brainerd et al.•SCIENCE OF FALSE MEMORY.•2005

  • Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.

    Asher Koriat, Morris Goldsmith•Psychological Review•1996

  • Fuzzy-trace theory

    Open Access•Valerie F Reyna, Charles J Brainerd•Learning and Individual Differences•1995

  • Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims

    Open Access•Yael Orbach, Isaac Hershkowitz et al.•Child Abuse & Neglect•2000

  • Children’s delayed memory accuracy

    Open Access•Seungjin Lee•Current Psychology•2025

  • Cross-examination may be more detrimental to repeated-event children than single-event children

    Patricia I Coburn, Deborah A Connolly et al.•Memory•2022

  • Comparing children's and adults’ accounts of childhood injuries

    Open Access•Andrea S Taylor, Jacob Ingram et al.•Memory•2026

  • Long-lasting positive effects of collaborative remembering on false assents to misleading questions

    Open Access•Clelia Rossi-Arnaud, Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud et al.•Acta Psychologica•2020

  • “Are False Memories Permanent?”

    Open Access•Mary Lyn Huffman, Angela M Crossman et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•1997

  • Telling Stories

    Open Access•E Burman•Theory & Psychology•1997

  • Do Japanese children say `yes' to their mothers? A naturalistic study of response bias in parent-toddler conversations

    Open Access•Mako Okanda, Shoji Itakura•First Language•2007

  • Isolating the effects of the cognitive interview techniques

    Open Access•Amina Memon, Linsey Wark et al.•British Journal of Psychology•1997

  • The role of repeated interviewing in children's responses to cross‐examination‐style questioning

    Open Access•Sarah O’neill, Rachel Zajac•British Journal of Psychology•2013

  • Accuracy and confidence in estimation of speaker age

    Sara Maria Birgitta Skoog Waller•International Journal of Speech…•2021

  • Fuzzy-trace theory and memory development

    Open Access•Charles J Brainerd, Valerie F Reyna•Developmental Review•2004

  • Recent research on children’s testimony about experienced and witnessed events

    Open Access•Margaret-Ellen Pipe, Margaret‐Ellen Pipe et al.•Developmental Review•2004

  • How children talk about events

    Open Access•Sonja P Brubacher, Carole Peterson et al.•Developmental Review•2019

  • Versão preliminar do teste pictórico de memória

    Open Access•Fabian Javier Marín Rueda, Fermino Fernandes Sisto•Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)•2008

  • The Effects of Investigative Utterances on Israeli Children's Reports of Physical Abuse

    Isaac Hershkowitz, Irit Hershkowitz et al.•Applied Developmental Science•1999

  • True and false memories in children and adults

    Daniel L Schacter, Jerome Kagan et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1995

  • The effects of stereotypes and suggestions on preschoolers' reports

    Michelle D Leichtman, Stephen J Ceci•Developmental Psychology•1995

  • Children's recall 1 or 2 years after an event

    Margaret-Ellen Pipe, Margaret‐Ellen Pipe et al.•Developmental Psychology•1999

  • Children's memory for medical emergencies

    Carole Peterson•Developmental Psychology•1999

  • Cues and secrets

    Margaret-Ellen Pipe, Margaret‐Ellen Pipe et al.•Developmental Psychology•1994

  • Mere memory testing creates false memories in children

    Charles J Brainerd, Valerie F Reyna•Developmental Psychology•1996

  • Large language models' knowledge of children's memory and suggestibility

    Open Access•Pekka Santtila, Yangbo Sun et al.•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • Helping children to remember

    Susan Gee, Margaret-Ellen Pipe et al.•Developmental Psychology•1995

  • Learning rate, learning opportunities, and the development of forgetting

    Charles J Brainerd, Valerie F Reyna•Developmental Psychology•1995

  • The influence of prior knowledge and repeated questioning on children's long-term retention of the details of a pediatric examination

    Peter A Ornstein, Lynne Baker-Ward et al.•Developmental Psychology•2006

  • Logic and Conversation

    H P Grice•Speech Acts•1975

  • Gist is the grist

    Open Access•Charles J Brainerd, Valerie F Reyna•Developmental Review•1990

  • Development of Long-Term Retention

    Open Access•Mark L Howe, Charles J Brainerd et al.•Development of Long-Term Retention•1992

  • Suggestibility of the child witness

    Stephen J Ceci, Maggie Bruck•Psychological Bulletin•1993

  • Misleading children's story recall

    Mark L Howe•Developmental Psychology•1991

  • Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults

    Debra Ann Poole, Lawrence T White•Developmental Psychology•1991

  • Nondeliberate memory for a novel event among preschoolers

    Diane Carlson Jones, Dan J Swift et al.•Developmental Psychology•1988

  • The effect of a five-month delay on children's and adults' eyewitness memory

    Open Access•Rhona H Flin, Rhona Flin et al.•British Journal of Psychology•1992

Unique citing works33
Citations per year1,03
Citation span1993 - 2026 (34)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 31

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae