Reception of mother's referential messages by deaf and hearing children
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9786375 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sherri MacKay-Soroka (corresponding author), Sandra E Trehub (0000-0002-7940-1258), Leigh A Thorpe |
| Year | 1988 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 277-285 |
| Publication date | 1988-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Developmental Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-1649 • E-ISSN: 1939-0599 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037//0012-1649.24.2.277 |
| OpenAlex | W4256375792 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 2 |
Hearing children 4, 6, and 8 years of age and deaf children 6 to 10 years of age who communicated orally (speech only) or bimodally (speech plus sign) participated in two receptive communication tasks. In Task 1, their mothers described, orally or bimodally, a designated picture from a set of four pictures so that the child could identify the intended referent from the four alternatives. In Task 2, the child was not given the stimulus set until the mother had completed her description. The presence or absence of the referential array had no differential effect on hearing or deaf children's ability to select the intended referent. Age-related improvements were apparent in the performance of hearing children, with 6- and 8-year-olds making more correct selections than did 4-year-olds. Deaf children performed more poorly than did hearing children but the performance of orally and bimodally communicating children did not differ. In a subsequent experiment, two adults with appropriate communicative competence acted as receivers for each mother's videotaped messages. The receptive performance of these adults revealed that the messages of bimodally communicating mothers were less adequate than those of orally communicating mothers. When the inadequate messages of mothers were excluded, the receptive performance of deaf children who communicated bimodally was found to be better than that of deaf children who communicated orally. In contrast to the increasing interest in communication between mothers and their deaf preschool children (for a review, see Meadow-Orlans, 1987), there has been little comparable research with deaf school-age children. The research with deaf preschoolers has revealed mother-child communication that is greatly impoverished when compared with matched hearing dyads (Meadow, Greenberg, Erting, & Carmichael, 1981; Schlesinger & Meadow, 1972). However, there is evidence to suggest that the early use of bimodal (oral with manual) communication may prevent some of these problems by promoting mutually satisfying interaction between mothers and their deaf children (Greenberg, 1984). It is unclear, however, whether bimodal communication is facilitative in structured as well as unstructured situations between mothers and children and whether its advantages continue beyond the preschool period. Because exclusively oral as well as bimodal programs represent alternative educational options for deaf children, it is important
Audiology · Competence (human resources · Developmental psychology · Language development · Linguistics · Referent · Set (abstract data type · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Speech and dialogue systems
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,11 |
| Citation span | 1988 - 2004 (17) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |