How selective are 3-year-olds in imitating novel linguistic material
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9795171 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Colin Bannard (0000-0001-5579-5830, The University of Texas at Austin, corresponding author), Jörn Klinger (The University of Texas at Austin), M Tomasello (0000-0002-1649-088X, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 2344-2356 |
| Publication date | 2013-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Developmental Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-1649 • E-ISSN: 1939-0599 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/a0032062 |
| PMID | 23458663 |
| OpenAlex | W2153382400 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 16 |
In 3 studies we explored when 3-year-olds would imitate novel words in utterances produced by adult speakers. Child and experimenter took turns in requesting objects from a game master. The experimenter always went first and always preceded the object's familiar name with a novel adjective (e.g., "the dilsige duck"). In the first 2 experiments, we found that children were more likely to reproduce the adjective when there were 2 different instances of the same object present in the situation than when there was only 1 or when there were 2 objects of different types present. Thus, children seemed to be sensitive to the descriptive and contrastive function of the adjectives in determining which parts of the utterances to reproduce. Nonetheless, replication of even redundant material was over 50%, suggesting a strategy of somewhat blind copying. In the 3rd experiment, we found that children were less likely to reproduce a redundant adjective when the speaker indicated gesturally that he did not intend to produce it than when he clearly produced it intentionally. We distinguish insightful imitation (the copying of a speaker's goal and means when motivated by insight into why those particular means were chosen) and blind imitation (the copying of a speaker's goal and means with no awareness of why those specific means were chosen) from mimicry. We explore the roles that these modes of imitation might play in language development
Adjective · Cognitive imitation · Cognitive psychology · Copying · Imitation · Language acquisition · Linguistics · Mimicry · Noun · Object (grammar · Child and Animal Learning Development · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Language and cultural evolution · Psychology · Social Psychology
Verbal and More
The role of spontaneous verbal repetition sequences as shared discourse in early linguistic development ( Las secuencias de repetición verbal espontánea como formas de discurso compartido en el desarrollo lingüístico temprano )
How children learn to produce appropriate referring expressions in narratives
Shifting toward progressive and balanced interaction
Spontaneous verbal repetition in toddler-adult conversations
‘Over-imitation’
Sociodemographic and Pre-Linguistic Factors in Early Vocabulary Acquisition
Turvey’s Two Challenges and Ecological Values-Realizing Theory
Children show selectively increased language imitation after experiencing ostracism
How do 3- and 5-year-olds respond to under- and over-informative utterances
The units of language acquisition
MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models
Rational imitation in preverbal infants
Fourteen- through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions
The hidden structure of overimitation
Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens)
Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates
Stored Word Sequences in Language Learning
Logic and Conversation
The uses of imitation
Performing without competence
Copying actions and copying outcomes
Understanding the intentions of others
From over-imitation to super-copying
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.77 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2026 (14) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |